You think these college scientists get MONEY?? lmao... you have never been in a university science dept then

Oh my gosh! I'm sorry I have missed out on this conversation! This is my kind of discussion!!! Love it!

Those things that are hard and fast facts like I mentioned about can not be flawed...

No that's when they get used by the professors who earn the money

GamersForTrump, you wanna get caught up first ?

We can hold a pause in the chat

LOL... you think university professors get money and get rish off of this??

Again, you have never been in a University science dept

Don't need to be to see the corruption

It's dangerous to label an entire profession as corrupt

I believe it's more dangerous to believe a whole entire profession just because they call themselves scientists

Okay, then maybe not. Can we take a pause ?

My father was an astronomer and astrophysicist... he had Ph. Ds in both

Yeah I could take a pause, my b

Creation is still learning about itself. Science, knowledge, facts are evolving as creation does.

I would take exception to anyone calling him, or anyone he worked with, corrupt

I also have degrees in 2 types of science fields...

@GamersForTrump We also spoke about this in general chat if you wanna get caught up there.

I would take exception to being called corrupt as well

@JunoBlade Could you pause just for a little bit while Gamers gets caught up, lol ?

I know quite a lot of people that work in and research in science departments at universities... not a single one of them is corrupt

and they are ALL in it for the love of their field

Intellect always wants to be king. The greatest and ascended masters who have walked this planet had knowing beyond the intellect.

It's Obvious, toony, that you don't KNOW any of the scientists who work in these places.

Can I interject something ?

I'd like to show a short clip from a movie. Yeah it's just a movie but he makes a point that is so true.

Go for it!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2ppyMUlXfM

It sums up this whole discussion in a minute lol

And those changes in perspective were driven by SCIENCE.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe

But you sound like all of these things are factual even though you admit that science can change

if anyone needs any explanation of the technical stuff in that wikpedia page let me know

Meaning that things of fact will always be fact

I said that SOME things in science are FACT... I cited them above

we use those things we KNOW to be true to figure out other things

What if those things end up being updated from future science

We KNOW how fast light travels... and we can use that to estimate distances

Which means they're not fact

You mean you would think we know

We still don't fully know how gravity works