wait for it

*insert bathroom joke*

:/

Lol

I can keep 'em coming....

...oh crap

...this is some 💩

Funny! Do you ride that mare in the photo @SharpStuff ?

At one point, yes.

She's no longer at the stables however.

One of the volunteers took the mare in for retirement

How nice?

How nice!!!

Wrong punctuation

What happened to your horse? @GamersForTrump

Lol

I was not saying lol to ur horse @GamersForTrump it was about the wrong punctuation

I understood @U WISH . No problem!! 💕

@Skittles I had to have our vet microchip a foal so we could register her with Fell Pony Society.

I named her Trump’s Victory Rose

I’m done with roblox

They banned me for defending my race when I girl said whites arnt from American (they arnt) so then I said blacks aren’t either so yay

That sux. Jeez dude the censorship is getting scary in this country.

Ikr

I was gonna buy robux but never mind

Have you tried to appeal or nah?

They declined

of course they did

Mhm

This is from an article, and quite interesting:

way to go @DariusGalaxyz, you just advanced to level 9 <:magahat:772838503239122984>

"The question that may have arisen among the Justices is whether — if they acted after December 8 — they would be creating a scenario where the Governor of Pennsylvania will have timely complied with the “Safe Harbor” provision in naming the State’s Electors, and Congress, led by the Democrat-controlled House, would simply ignore the Supreme Court’s injunction issued against Pennsylvania if it came on December 9 or later, on the basis that federal law — 3 USC Sec. 5 — had been complied with and dictated the outcome. The Congress would have to choose between following the statute or respecting the Court’s decision, and with partisanship where it stands, the answer to that question is in serious doubt.

This puts the Court in the position that it has historically sought to avoid — “ordering” actions of co-equal branches of government that it has little power to enforce, and thereby running the risk that its Order will be ignored and the institutional authority of the Court undermined as a result."

what article is that from?

@stoneytoney https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/12/07/is-justice-alitos-date-switch-intended-to-head-off-a-constitutional-confrontation-with-the-house-n290554

Yeah something weird is going on

so the question is based on whether or not the court acted before or after the 8th, but in this case it sounds like they're trying to act before the 8tth?

All of a sudden MSM is starting to report on Aliens again

https://nypost.com/2020/12/07/aliens-in-hiding-until-mankind-is-ready-ex-israeli-space-head/

They are trying to whitewash these investigations

so really it all depends on whether or not they make a decision tomorrow