Message from @President-Elect The-Big-Hurt
Discord ID: 788878390202990613
I like this quote from the founder of the #WalkAway campaign, Brandon Straka:
**A white liberal man complained about the white male patriarchy & told me the way of the future is to turn over power to women of color. I named a roster of black, Hispanic, and Asian conservative women & asked if he’d support them being in power. Silence.
In the end, liberal white males will vote for an 80 year old white male before a woman of color who’s conservative. Why? Because their words mean nothing. They don’t support women of color. They USE women of color as Trojan horses for their own progressive agendas. In the end, using women and using racial minorities this way is the ultimate exercise of misogyny, chauvinism, and racial superiority.**
way to go @DariusGalaxyz, you just advanced to level 14 <:magahat:772838503239122984>
Holy crap guys, did you know that the Senate rules allow for the sergeant-at-arms to arrest members in order to establish a quorum ?!?!?!
Where did you read that?
Press CTRL + F and search for arrest.
I'm currently mobile so I'll have to do that when I get home
I don't know if Pence would resort to that or not, but the sergeant-at-arms can compel or even arrest.
Never mind, it was a PDF so I could just hit the search icon 😅 that's insane though!
I'm confused about something though. I know that if no candidate receives the 270+ votes that the House votes for president from state delegation, but what I'm seeing conflicting info about is during the contestation period of the certification of each of the electors, do they still vote by state delegation, or is it a regular vote ?
It's a sealed vote, so in other words, they voted but no one knows how they voted. come January 6th they open up the envelopes and count the votes.
Is that what you were talking about?
Well that's the entire proces I'm talking about, but I'm talking about both chambers of Congress objecting to and then voting on rejecting certain electors.
I believe if I'm not mistaken on what you're saying, is delegation up until the point where they don't have 270 votes. I'm trying to understand your question sorry.
During the counting of each states' electoral votes, if 1 member from each chamber object to the counting of one, then the joint session of Congress must divide into their separate chambers and debate and then vote on a motion to withdraw the elector(s).
Then that vote would be a regular vote I would imagine
That scares me then cuz there's no way either chamber is gonna vote to discard Biden electors.
Don’t be so sure. The republicans fear a progressive Biden agenda more than they dislike the president.
I don't know if I agree.
The problem is the order that was pushed by the house I believe that said the electoral college voters can not go against the popular vote
Some of the Republicans are wolves in sheep clothing and actually secretly desire what the Dems do
Sorry I’m going back to earlier in the conversation
Which order by the House ?
Not to sure but I remember basically it said the electoral college voters could not vote against the popular vote
Let me see if I can find it
I don't think that's in a law, sounds like somebody's opinion
I think this has something to do with it
I’m not so good on all the legal stuff though, so let me know if I’m wrong
That is an opinion like you were saying
No no, I don't mean a court opinion, that's different cuz it's legally binding, lol. By opinion, I meant by just a regular person or a non-justice.
This also seem related, but again I’m not very smart when it comes to this stuff so sorry
I think that's the same case, lol.
Well it was related then 😅
Well then now I'm not sure what to make of any of this, cuz it wouln't matter what happens outside of court then, right ?
January 6th, 2021 wouldn't matter
we're not hoping they vote against the populous vote, we want there vote to not count, that's why we're hopping they get rejected.
That's true, lol.
Yeah yeah for sure