Or, Occam's Razor: They don't like loli hentai because the politicians download the majority of the really hardcore shit and they run the risk of getting found out.

Jesus man. Sometimes I really wonder about the human race.

@Psychedelic Corpse Fucker In defense of the human race... most of these people didn't survive winter, in the past.

You can't protect the chaff and be surprised they're still chaff.

But why go after loli in the first place?

Ok

Same reason they do anything: projection.

I am back

@PreschoolFightClub 👋

Technically speaking. If the loli can't consent. ***ALL HENTAI*** is guilty.

Not just loli hentai

@[chase dreams] Now you're getting the idea of how NPC programming works.

What... the hell did I just walk into?

But it's a drawing.

I've actually seen articles of how hentai is inherently misogynistic because it's depicting women in fantasy settings that they don't have control over.

<:face_palm:541722313494888478>

@PreschoolFightClub scroll up to see Five's theory on how NPCs justify kiddyfiddling but hate loli

It's fucking porn of drawn, fictional, women.

Fictional women that can't consent. So, misogyny. Ree.

<:Think_Gun_SewerSlide:529160524416417807>

Anita Sarkeesian talks about exactly this shit in video games; other feminists just run with her asinine talking points and apply it to anime.

Hell, Monica REEEEal has said as much, herself, even before the Vic thing started.

I'm going to commit aliven't

"These women didn't consent to these things."

"Yeah, because they're not real."

"And that's the misogyny of the male power fantasy."

This shit is so stupid.

Anita was trying to protect the rights of video game characters and none of them criticized her idiocy.

Anita needs to commit self unistall.

@PreschoolFightClub Agreed on both counts.

The world would be a much batter place without her.

Batter?

⚾

better*

Or baby batter? 🤔

No idea how I ended up typing "batter"

Regarding your theory. Technically the drawings are a result of the creative work of the directors. Doesn't that therefore mean consent from all involved parties?

Look at how they're treating creative work currently. They're outright inventing consented parties just to strike the material down.

As an example, think of some of the guys who mock, but don't show outright, Twitch thot behavior, but still get banned for it.

That requires the inventing of a non-consenting, offended party, on whom you act on behalf of.

Fucking *satire* will get you community strikes, these days.

Yeah.

People have gotten entire channels taken down.