after the middle stage of the third trimester

So you see it as solely based on time and nothing else?

Sure. But if somebody kills a pregnant woman, they are charged with TWO murders.
The law doesn't dictate what's alive. Abortion is destructive

well, i think that abortion should be legal just in general, but thats my specific opinion

basically

Have any of you had a girl abort the child you planted in her???

no

At which stage of development should it be illegal and why??

That may change your opinion

Why are you here defending abortion? This is meme talk

cuz of a meme i saw

i couldnt react to it there, so im reacting to it here

after the third trimester

The abortion argument is quite simple, if the thing in the mothers womb is a living human, then its murder, but if not, then its no worse than poping a pimle
so the question becomes when is that object concidered human

and why??

cuz i think after the third trimester, the baby is basically guaranteed to live to term

"murder" is a legal term for the unlawful taking of a human life, at this time it is not illegal.

that depends if its human or not

Tell that to Scott Peterson

why tho? its in her body, taking a toll on her, and she wants to abort it, better that, than her dying, or me having to raise it by myself

In the US a fetus is pretty much guaranteed to live to term after conception. The numbers lost in the early term are statistically very small.

But she didn’t magically make that baby appear in her. It takes two to tango

“the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another” so um how would I make it law full

tru, but if its even legal, it needs to have atleast some sort of decent time frame

I was raised by a single father after I was 11, worked out fine

yeh, and ur asking for my opinion on it, and i gave it

I would say especially if it isn’t life threatening then abortion should be illegal. There is adoption for a reason

ik that, but in any case, if i could preserve the life of the mother, or preserve the relationship, i'd rather have an abortion happen

either the child isnt considerd human making the law not pertain to abortion, or change the law

or legal definition I should say

Abortions are for people who don't have a plan for life, or just don't wanna take responsibility for their actions, or don't like using condoms.

The rape, incest, health argument makes up a small portion of abortions, and that's all I'll say about it.

@ASween so like, what if I buy a private island and murder there with my own laws 🤨

Defund abortion and fund adoption

sure, but until adoption becomes much more streamlined, i think its much more humane to just abort the baby, cuz imo, i'd rather not start living, rather than live a horrible life being shuttled around foster care, or with a bad adoptive family

so? its still up to the people to adopt the kids, and most ppl prefer having bio kids

In the US, less than 1% of abortion are made to prevent the death of the mother.

But that doesn't answer my question. Why is is acceptable to kill the fetus in the first trimester by not the last, or before age 2 for that matter??

then it would be legaly ok, bc you are following your own laws, but it wouldnt change the ethical morrals though

Lmao, adoption is hard.

Just kill the kid.

cuz the fetus is less developed

Hmmm. My dad and my oldest nephew were adopted. So they should have just been aborted?