Message from @❄֍Winter Soul֍❄
Discord ID: 771090522868940881
huh, these florida polls seem very familiar...
I see Twitter is doing their part to help prepare for denying the election results
I though that was trump say "it could be days, months, even years before we know" but that was an exaduration
I’m referring to where it says “you could encounter unconfirmed claims that a candidate has won their rase.”
oh, ok, I assumed and that was wrong of me
Trump did say that, but more so as to provide a case against mail in voting
but mail in voting has historically worked
true, but never in the volume that we see in this election. It puts a strain on the election infrastructure of places that are not used to heavy volumes of mail in ballots
Mail in isnt the problem, it’s universal mail in. And the people behind mail in in some states.
> but mail in voting has historically worked
@chaz because no one has unearthed the raw truth about how much fraud is in the system until this year
By yours truly, trump.
there is some fraud, but not nearly as much as he says
no, because it is no a site I find reliable
Really? Even though they have caught numerous people that even the courts would let in under hearsay exceptions, they are unreliable?
On Kamala Harris 👆🏽
@Froski the unrilability or vetirtas is based off hearsay on this channel so I will look into it
Not sure you know what hearsay is.
@❄֍Winter Soul֍❄ for this site I found a servey of 5,000 republiocans and 5,000 democrates of what was agreed as the most reliable news sites, (in order: economist, BBC, PBS, NPR)
@Froski some said that they paid people to do thing that were then reported on by vertitas
hearsay
so I need to research weather it is slander or proof
Okay, well hearsay, as defined it an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. One of the exceptions to hearsay is when someone makes a statement that is against their own interest, which is what occurs in every single video.
For example, this one (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWK56l2VaLY) where one of Ilhan Omar's employees is working to buy absentee ballots off of people to vote for them.
but as a colloquial definition, it is something someone heard but does not have evidence for
No. I am giving you the legal definition, as any attorney would tell you. It is an out of court statement that is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. I could say the sky is blue, and there could be evidence to support that, but it is still an out of court statement, being offered to prove that the sky is in fact blue.
the unrilability or vetirtas is based off a statement in this discord that did not give proof
Rephrase that
again, ok
@❄֍Winter Soul֍❄ @Froski -better
mine eyes bequeathed upon me a sight 'pon humble channel, general, it was named,
where a personage, without ideas but their own, the word of proud veritas they declaimed, The told a story about fraud, voter fraud designed by Veritas; a poor man was framed he told to of a bribe, 10,000$ to create lies, the framed should be ashamed, but without evidence I must declare,
"more must but known, for mistrust is in the air"
BREAKING: ‘Anonymous’ Author Is CNN Contributor, Google Employee, Biden Supporter
https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-anonymous-author-is-cnn-contributor-google-employee-biden-supporter
Okay Shakespeare, how does that undermine the validity of Project Veritas?
@❄֍Winter Soul֍❄ @Froski -better
mine eyes bequeathed upon me a sight 'pon humble channel, general, it was named,