Message from @Less Broken
Discord ID: 778290762663591947
> I don't see the manual saying "Feed it with Biden-marked test stacks". It could as well have been Trump stacks, it only depends on the user's will. Only the commenter here assumes that it has been used pro-Biden. Not to say it hasn't been done, just saying it's far from being proof, and doesn't warrant 3 rotating-lights.
@Alexis Fontana yeah I’m still skeptical too
I feel like there’s fraud on both sides
There is at least an over-expectation to find fraud on our side at least. I'm all for it, but I really hope Saint Guliani and Saint Sidney actually have something in the pipe 😉
While I think there’s fraud on both sides the msm is really trying to push all fraud claims on trump when it seems most of it is on biden
> I don't see the manual saying "Feed it with Biden-marked test stacks". It could as well have been Trump stacks, it only depends on the user's will. Only the commenter here assumes that it has been used pro-Biden. Not to say it hasn't been done, just saying it's far from being proof, and doesn't warrant 3 rotating-lights.
@Alexis Fontana so 2 rotating lights then?
someone isn't paying attention... lol
Just keeping in mind that fraud happens on both sides
Biden camp may did it more than us, but it is still a possibility that some trump voters also committed fraud
For sure.
@isoboto Statistics and common sense says that was not the problem.
^^^ for sure. but both sides can play the game
But that is like a couple hundred/thousand rather then 3 fucking million is kinda retarded
just because the evidence is pointing suspiciously on one side only doesn't mean the other is completely innoncent
people doing wrong can only go so far (which is still wrong and a crime) vs a entire organization(s) that have control over the counts/ballots.
@isoboto that is pretty ambiguous, yeap lets assume both sides comminted voter fraud, problem is the ratio was like 500:1 in democraps favor...
1000/1 don’t give them to much credit
> @isoboto that is pretty ambiguous, yeap lets assume both sides comminted voter fraud, problem is the ratio was like 500:1 in democraps favor...
@Gio no. i'm just saying both sides can committed frauds. just because you're a republican doesn't mean you don't committed voter fraud. the frauds are currently skewing heavily one-side, yes, but republican can still committed fraud (maybe to a much, much lesser degree)
Trump taking Cali would be the biggest kek, but not gonna happen
that shit scary. CA F-ing red
VA will only go red if the national popular vote goes red.
Current state rules
Some truly dumb rules
Entire state could go red yet still vote blue from pop vote? Big dumb
Ya all they need to do is win California and pump enough voter fraud to win popular vote every 4 years and get 68 electorates with only 2 states...that’s over 25% needed
@Less Broken could I get a link to that?
Its basically saying "Why even vote when the rest of the country will decide who you vote for"
The person who tweeted it got suspended
guys where i can check the score of recount?
If that’s the case I would lmfaoo
That map is funny
@Kocherga it's rediculously hard to find good sources. Crowder and Tomcast IRL are the most consistent in updates.
Timcast
And Tim pool
Crowder is unapologetically biased, Tim is more balanced.
@Less Broken that's fake. scytl data wasn't seized by anyone that would let that information get out.
Tim is a fence sitter