Trump made the elections a matter of National Security. National Security =Military actions.

He also specifically said in the 2018 EO that foreign election interference was an Extraordinary Violation of National Security. 😎😎

It’s coming. Biggest military sting operation in history.

Yes, but National Security doesn't fall into the jurisdiction of the Military Courts.

No but TREASON during a time of “war” would 🍿🍿🍿🍿

@Pal3Rid3r https://law.jrank.org/pages/8564/Military-Law-Military-Criminal-Justice-System.html

I hate to be the person to just give a source without just explaining it, but I'm at work, and this gives a pretty good explanation regarding what Military Courts have jurisdiction over. I believe you are greatly mistaken about the purpose of those courts.

?

Have we declared war?

When are we not? Think war on drugs. Words have meanings.

Navy here, Military Tribunal is a on the spot trial instead of going through the steps of a courts martial. Either way a military court is only for violation of the UCMJ and can only be used on military members.

Aside from that we are in military operations all over.

Thank you @EnragedHurdyGurdy

They mean actual war, not side quests

@EnragedHurdyGurdy <#743681899456626743> if you'd like to get verified and be given a role for navy.

@Froski I'm an old salt and all this fancy technology is new to me, I have no idea what's being asked for in <#743681899456626743> I'll take the tag though if I can get it explained.

I'll move to DMs.

Committed by service members. Please don't cut out of context 🙂

I know the UCMJ. Former USMC here. Now this states of the federal level jurisdiction is currently busy, “fill a gap “ , wouldn’t that gap be filled by a tribunal? Where have all the SCOTUS Justices been REASSIGNED to?

The second highlighted area is only to show it can be used on civilians. It’s relevant

Or by civilian accompanying the armed forces over seas.

The Supreme Court Justices have been reassigned to different Federal Circuits, as they are constantly in rotation. The Federal Courts are not "too busy" which is the argument that seems to make.

The President of the United States or "POTUS" functions as the head of the United States federal government. The president directly oversees all agencies of the executive branch of government and is considered the commander-in-chief of all branches of the United States Armed Forces.

military
(8) The term “military” refers to any or all of the armed forces.
Source

10 USC § 801(8)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/894
a) Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;
.......
(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

Wait, although we suspect Trump is playing 4-d chess with an EO from 2018, it may also happen that this EO was just designed for another threat, and not related to the Biden fraud, even if backed by China and Iran, and not intended for use today. Maybe this EO is a false lead, and all we really have is just a lot of fraud.

This instance I’ve provided isn’t linked to today current situation. I’m only pointing out that, to my untrained eyes, I see that when there’s a gap at the federal jurisdiction level that a tribunal may be considered. Same with the second part. Not related to our current situation, but it does point out that tribunals can and have been used on civilians during times of war.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/802 Persons subject to that chapter 🙂

in concert with any other person

Sorry just got here. To whom are we speaking of with these articles

Except Trump LOST PA.. so how is that a huge win?

I'm sorry? In US Code § 894 it states initially that the entire section only applies to people subject to the chapter. Therefore, for that to apply to a civilian, they must into one of the sections listed under § 802.

The marines will be used to capture these deep state actors during our time of war.

Esper publicly said he didn't support invoking the Insurrection Act which would allow active duty troops to be used to help quell the wave of protests across the country.

POTUS can take full control of the Marines and only the marines. All of them.

https://t.co/8QR5S3tQmN

So, (1) we'd need to trying those people AND they'd need to be taken as prisoners of war first to be able to be tried in a military court and (2) the that would require other organizations to be assigned to serving with the armed forced for them to apply.

There was a new dimension of warfare added in these last few decades. Cyber

https://www.cisa.gov/

Also created by trump in 2018

🍿🍿🍿🍿