So if the head SC said it’s fine, it’s fine. They won’t take a case after the election saying “well we didn’t like this either” when they had time before the election to make a case against it.

let me guess, roberts

roberts has been a rino for a while

That would open elections years later to be done the same way. The losing party could just say fuck that and go to a friendly Supreme Court every time.

You don’t want that.

I don't know what exactly they're at the SC for

I'll post if there's any updates or that post of mine was completely bunk

Alito expects a word from them by the 9th

And there is no reports of results changing

that prob wont happen being the trump campaign say that have clear evidence of voter fraud, if we let this continue then republican's will never win. If trump wins i would like him to do a overhaul on the election

As far as what I have read, the small amount of ballots received after the election has still not even been counted.

In Pa

Recieved

Sounds fishy

In accordance to what Alito ordered.

Well the post office was running a little slow before the election. It’s bound to happen no?

And again. They haven’t even been added to the count yet.

<#760648730431979560> please

@metallica846 I believe your quoting an article from before the election can you give a link instead of a copy and paste. It's too easy to clip an article that is biased.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/10/28/us/supreme-court-pennsylvania-north-carolina-absentee-ballots.amp.html

acb didn't know each state's own constitutional laws on election process, on a national scale, that is needed when making a final decision and she was legit in not deciding on something she wasn't fully versed in

However it's isn't her circuit

but like every other case brought before the national sc, it can be redecided at any time in the future

so once she's fully versed on the subject materials ..she can decide at a future date once it returns to the national sc for review

@metallica846 the ruling was a 4 to 4 deadlock and was stated that it could be brought to scotus at a later date

the national sc may be the final court..but it doesn't mean everything stops there once decided at one time..it can be brought up for review repeated number of times til somebody decides to put it into constitutional law

Scotus votes on which case they want to hear 4 votes to see it gets the case accepted

More suits being filed in PA.

From Steve Bannon's War Room

The Pennsylvania case left open the possibility of later action by the court.
“I reluctantly conclude that there is simply not enough time at this late date to decide the question before the election,” Justice Alito wrote.
“Although the court denies the motion to expedite” the petition seeking review, he wrote, the petition “remains before us, and if it is granted, the case can then be decided under a shortened schedule.”
The court’s refusal to move more quickly came a little more than a week after it deadlocked, 4 to 4, on an emergency application in the case. The Pennsylvania Republican Party had asked the justices to temporarily block a ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that allowed election officials to count some mailed ballots received up to three days after Election Day

Too late now

got til dec 14th

national sc can order delay of ec meetup til this problem is settled

SCOTUS can also rule pass the dec 14th deadline

Yes

final date for scotus ruling is jan 20th 2021

unless a doj investigation exposes something that is past jan 20th 2021

then it can be put into further limbo til everything is exposed completely

All of this doesnt truely matter. once they see the fraud in the dominion machines itll all be thrown out

and a new election is scheduled without voting machines

<:trumpwater:604044244172406804>