Message from @V》sADpUS(~~☆▪☆~~)
Discord ID: 787255001407553566
Not that I want one
I suppose you aren't aware that it is not 39 states that are siding with Texas, but 39 states have picked a side. 20 states and 3 territories have joined the 4 states being sued by Texas, as in they are openly defending corruption and fraud! https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-now-democrat-attorneys-general-align-pennsylvania-michigan-wisconsin-georgia-nearly-every-state-picked-sides/
21 states have sided with Texas, 24 states and 3 territories (who dont have a legal pot to piss in) have sided against texas.
So are we losing?
Imagine if these blue states decide to secede and these red states just embargo all transport of goods between the two sides. lol.
The blue states can't cook
They cook in da microwave
The number of states is irrelevant really
Its PR only
the supreme court turned down the case
says "states can how elections how they want" and stuff like that
That is a pretty stupid rule
If we are a unified nation, why do we all have seperate rules for running the presidental election?
We honestly need an amendment to the constitution saying that all states participating in presidental elections, or anything federal where all states participate (excluding house, senate, and local races) must use a predetermined set of rules, so there are no more of these controversies ever again
If anyone proposed that, no matter the party, I would vote for them
I don't want to deal with this garbage
Elections are performed by the states. We don't want to open a can of worms with that. Interestingly, most have forgotten that the SCOTUS threw out a multi state suit led by Oklahoma and Nebraska against Colorado's weed legalization. Hearing the case would violate state sovereignty among themselves, and thus the suit was thrown out. This current ruling is within perfect legal precedence
There are solutions, namely actually enforcing the laws we have. 99.99% of the time that covers the "need for new laws"
The current ruling is not in the same category as Colorado's weed legalization. WI, PA, MI, and GA all violated their own state constitutions, as well as the federal constitution by making laws without state legislation. That is the argument.
I heard something about Texas trying to secede from the Union can anyone confirm this?
Ah shit
I'm in the part of Texas slated to become part of Mexico in that map up there
texas is trying to form a loyalist union to the constitution, so no, not secede..but every state not with texas technically would be criminally seceding
Yeah, and "defund the police" doesn't mean " defund the police."
can someone please provide a new link or reference for this information about the Texas Union? Thank you
Epico
That just fills me with hope tbh
Why do I have this awful feeling in the pit of my stomach though? Like this is only tip of the iceberg?
Cause it is tbh
I hope that nothing extreme happens the second I sign my papers for the National Guard.
Does anyone know what seceding from the Union would entail if Texas were to actually do it?
I know....I've been checking the rounds in my magazines and the locks on my door.
I live in TX so it's quite important to know
Uh, maybe military intervention? I’m interested to see what Texarkana looks like after that, being a border town and all.