berkleynews

do you think its photoshopped?

https://news.berkeley.edu/2020/02/04/native-mascots-survey/

is it actually Native Americans or is it some Mexicans dressed up and virtue signaling

read the article dawg

are you that delusional

It was a joke DAWG

...how old are you

Why does that matter

just curious

13...

right in the name

redskin

calling them red skinned when they arent

Yeah but white people get called white all the time

so i can call chinese people yellow skinned

We can’t call natives red?

not if they dont want to be

black people are brown but we still call them black

Mexicans are brown

Also, @muffin your source misstates the conclusion.

Overall, 49% of participants in the UC Berkeley study were found to strongly agree or agree that the Washington Redskins’ name is offensive, while 38% were not bothered by it. The remainder were undecided or indifferent.

So not a majority. The majority that cared maybe, but it was also a a sample size of just over 1000.

mexicans are like metis, a mix of spaniards and mayan, aztec and other tribes

yes thats true froski

who did

I think we should keep these names because it reminds us that native Americans still exist

blackhawks, chiefs those ones are ok imo

What about Cleveland Indians

what?

yeah. i saw it under a prageru post, i think?

Nice

ok, what are you trying to say

yes i know that

thats why i said i dont think it should be changed

"The logo is almost an exact mirror image of the Washington football team’s. The lone defense is that the team is named after not Native Americans but the World War One-era U.S. Army division “The Black Hawks,” which in turn took its name from a Sauk Indian chief."

-TNR

maybe its this too

This would be a great comeback story I hope it goes well for him

@healed eww

🐊🐊🐊

Im a Mississippi State fan, and I'm just waiting for us to get good. Every year we are somewhat good but we never get anywhere.

@isoboto you ready for the Edmonton football team?