It’s one example of how people don’t find it offensive

Find a Native American that is offended by it

ok

That ISN’T in some far left news source

Where is this

outside levis stadium

Where did you find it?

berkleynews

do you think its photoshopped?

https://news.berkeley.edu/2020/02/04/native-mascots-survey/

is it actually Native Americans or is it some Mexicans dressed up and virtue signaling

read the article dawg

are you that delusional

It was a joke DAWG

...how old are you

Why does that matter

just curious

13...

right in the name

redskin

calling them red skinned when they arent

Yeah but white people get called white all the time

so i can call chinese people yellow skinned

We can’t call natives red?

not if they dont want to be

black people are brown but we still call them black

Mexicans are brown

Also, @muffin your source misstates the conclusion.

Overall, 49% of participants in the UC Berkeley study were found to strongly agree or agree that the Washington Redskins’ name is offensive, while 38% were not bothered by it. The remainder were undecided or indifferent.

So not a majority. The majority that cared maybe, but it was also a a sample size of just over 1000.

mexicans are like metis, a mix of spaniards and mayan, aztec and other tribes

yes thats true froski

who did

I think we should keep these names because it reminds us that native Americans still exist

blackhawks, chiefs those ones are ok imo

What about Cleveland Indians

what?

yeah. i saw it under a prageru post, i think?

Nice

ok, what are you trying to say

yes i know that

thats why i said i dont think it should be changed