Message from @PantherUnit01
Discord ID: 774815349081505824
so, hypothetically, should a person be able to own, say a clusterbomb?
i mean firearms
with bombs you already have people that own tanks and whatnot
so, radiactive bullets
where to you draw the line
you do not need a fully auto
sorry
obviously with radioactive bullets, nukes and such, obviously not, but full autos should be fine
like if i want a full auto AK, i should be able to get one, assuming i dont have a mental illness, or really bad criminal record
and the best part is, i can get a full auto AK
There's zero justification for any type of guns to be banned. You have a moral right to keep and bear arms.
thank you
Some of you 2A defenders do a great job using the Constitution and statistics to show why guns are better for self defense. But here is a paper arguing why that is ultimately irrelevant: Your right to bear arms is a derivative right. If you have a right to life, you necessarily have a right to defend it by whatever means you can use to preserve yourself, including firearms. The "death tolls" that may come when arming a nation is a huge red herring.
basically, the concept of Fuck around, Find out
Fuck around with the right to life of someone, find out the consequences
as for the method, well firearms are fair game, and should be used
"Assault weapons are the #1 weapon used by criminals"
*Checks the FBI database and finds that Assault rifles are used 197 times in a violent crime* Mmmmhmmm BS checks out
handguns are more prevalent
More prevalent than that are:
Baseball bats
Hammers
Fists
Kicks
Strangulation
other objects (non-firearms)
basically anything else
In fact, the last time people tried disarming the American People, we shot back, revolted, and went on to build one of the most powerful nations on earth
I mean there was that one dude that blew up a building using a fertilizer.
And guns are suppossed to be the problem.
If anything, Human Ingenuity is and forever will be more dangerous then any firearm
or bomb
Yeah, human nature is the real problem. If you ban firearms, people will use metal bats and knives, until they use their own flesh and bones to kill people.
"Breaking News: President Kamala Harris bans all Americans from using their arms since they may be used for violent means"
<:KEK:726877368601411624>
bruh
*fun fact, there are 2 household cleaners that are the most common in the world sitting under peoples sinks rn that if combined, can create one of the deadliest weapons in the world*
i know
it was used to great extent in ww1, killing soldiers in their trenches quietly, except for the sounds of them hacking up their lungs
*and it wouldnt be hard for someone who wants to cause mayhem to have several gas bombs made and plant them in certain points in a city out if sight before activating them*
*me whos planning on mixing them in glass beer bottles and using them like molotovs if necessary*
hell even a small cluster could basically wipe out a large section of New York city
youd trap people inside multiple-story buildings and if it gets into the ventilation system, well not so good for the people on the upper floors
and just like that, we're all on a watchlist
and id say its something that is far worse than any nuclear bomb, because the blast is silent, the clouds are sometimes not visible to the naked eye, and itll stain pourus surfaces like concrete so itll stay for an even longer period of time
sulferic acid, make you lungs flacid
ammonia and bleach, forgot what that makes, but sucks to breathe