Message from @Lyte
Discord ID: 795480564245200906
Don't give them time to breathe either
I know all of that! There is NOWAY at this small 120 pounds I could weild such a thing! I have a OC who can wield one VERY well!
Ye that's another thing, weight, and strength.
Strength and Speed makes Power.
So having good power to yourself allows for easier execution on your attacks.
Being a resourceful and creative Swordsman is by far the best kind
Use your surroundings
For any blade, have a certain amount of power is always good.
Say you're in a sword fight, and you've managed to swat their blade away just long enough to stun them. He still has his weapon in his arm, but you've moved it temporarily out of the way. Take this opportunity and strike, look at the enemy and see what would be easiest to strike.
Typically, if you had your opponent focused on the upper side, strike him in the below. Whip that Rapier, and strike your Saber hard on his leg. Then kick him in the gut, and try to knock him down.
Always keep your guard up for he could recover fast.
Got some dirt in your hand? Play a little dirty, it's not like you're 2v1ing the guy. This ain't a duel, it's more of a street fight type of battle.
Totally Honorable because, using dirt to blind the enemy is only bad when you're having a simple spar/duel. If you're fighting for life or death, that's different, you can use some dirty tricks.
At least assuming the Duel, is a simple test of skills.
If the Duel is for a bet, has specific rules, or some other third thing, then using a little dirt should be okay, as long as you ain't 2v1ing the guy, cause that's unfair. Only time 2v1ing can be acceptable in a Life or Death battle is if you didn't agree to the Life or Death battle, or depending on the situation.
Because accepting a duel, that may cost your life, and then deciding to 2v1ing them is uncoolio. You accepted the fight, knowingly, that you may die.
it says something about your stregth when you sword can be used like a spear, and when you say a roman gladitor longsword do you mean a gladius byzantius?
who would win,super battle ship bismark or some ww1 area scout planes filled with legends?
Hmm
*Sabaton Intensifies*
BISMARK IN MOTION - A BEAST MADE OF STEAL
bismark wasn't that big of a battleship
The Iowa Class was 20,000 long tons heavier with a full load
and the Yamato-Class was 32,000 long tons heavier
Bismarck has a better reputation then Yamato because of how it went down fighting other battleships compared to the Yamato being torn apart by Aircraft
He called it a super battleship
In terms of historical context, it technically would have been as it was the most powerful battleship on earth at the time
But later in the war, absolutely not
For like 2 years
Yamatos launched in like 1942
If something is the biggest for a period of time and not all time, it’s hardly kept note of
Al Capone was unironically the best politician that Chicago ever had https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeji8marIqU&t=42s/
giant redpill
@Lyte your probably right, it just had 18 inchers, so i thought that was pretty super
yup, not my area of extperteece, sorry, but do you know what a helepolis is?
Fun fact, the last British Monarch to personally lead his soldiers into battle was a German
https://www.forces.net/services/tri-service/george-ii-last-british-monarch-lead-his-troops-battle
looks like one
All of you may ask yourself, how did we get here? It seems like ‘America First’ will be over forever, but how did it come to this? That’s my job to tell you. In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 or The Hart-Celler Act of 1965 named after Senator Philip Hart of Michigan and Representative Emanuel Celler of New York, both of whom were Democrats. The ladder of whom was a Jewish man that spent his whole career in Congress (1923-1973) to get something like this passed. He was a voice against the Immigration Act of 1924 which was signed by President Calvin Coolidge which made the already strict American Immigration Policy signed by his predecessor Warren G. Harding even more strict lowering the quota to 165,000 to Countries outside the Western Hemisphere, and they also kept the Eastern European Jew ban thanks to the Russian Revolution which was led by Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky both of whom were Jews. The Immigration law remained the same until 1952 when Congress passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 or The McCarran-Walter Act (Named after Senator Pat McCarran (D-NV) and Representative Francis E. Walter (D-PA-20)), it in some cases made Immigration more strict on trying to prevent Communists from infiltrating the Government, but removed the ban on China and Japan, but numbers that Chinese and Japanese people could enter remained quite low, but it’s worth mentioning that President Harry S Truman vetoed the Bill, but it was overridden. In 1965, Immigration was changed forever. Philip Hart may have his name on the Bill, but the TRUE man to get it through the Senate was President John F. Kennedy’s flesh and blood Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) who claimed it won’t change Immigration in the slightest, and that our cities will not be flooded with new immigrant annually, and later, his older brother Senator Robert Kennedy (D-NY) said it will be impossible to affect the ethnic balance of the...
@James Farmer this is some old screencap i found in my folder, is it the same thing you are talking about?
United States which turned out wrong. Celler was primaried out by Elizabeth Holtzman in 1972 widely because he was against the Equal Rights Amendment. He died of pneumonia on January 15, 1981. In 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 or the Simpson-Mazzoli Act of 1986 named after Senator Alan Simpson (R-WY) and Representative Romano L. Mazzoli (D-KY-03) which banned people from knowingly hiring illegal aliens, but in doing so, giving millions of them citizenship. It shifted elections big time, and soon, the once Republican heavy California went for Bill Clinton in 1992, and the closest it ever went going back to the Republicans was when President George W. Bush lost it by 9.95% in 2004.