but yeah

Oh god those video game gun image look atrocious

t33

Great tee... dr Mathew

the soviet boomer pistol

Some versions did fire the 9mm

That's my one gripe. That and the constant lighting glare. You gotta angle it right orherwise it's too bright

It's also known as 7.62 parabellum

The old cartridge or pre ww2 rounds for the luger

7.62x21 is the predecessor to the 9 x 19 Parabellum

ah i see

And If I remember correctly the 7.62x21 was developed from.....the 7.65×25 Borchdt or Borchardt I can't spell atm lol

That round was used exclusively by the Borchardt C93, which is a strange looking pistol

bro that fucking sucks. 😢

Oooooooooof. Feels bad man

dude, i cant imagine what i'd do if my dog died. he is like a brother that isnt also a fucking dick about everything.

Mine died a couple years ago and he was my best friend 🥺

Reimbor guys, pay your tax stamps or that could happen to you too

aye, im not looking to get my doggo shot.

are stag ar15s good?

they look aight, from what I can tell. :/

https://www.stagarms.com/stag-15/stag-15-firearms/stag-15-rifles/stag-15-m4-tactical/

idk, I might just get a S&W and upgrade the furniture. :/

Stag mil-spec

Is aight

Or get a Ruger AR

can i put a gun related meme here? I just found

You could but it would be seen more in @military and firearm memes

Also why do people want mil spec rifles?

Mil spec is ok, but there's far better options in the civilian market

I am no expert, but I know that mil spec gives a standard to which something is built, esp. in terms of dimensions. This just ensures some degree of continuity across the platform, making it easier to find upgrade/replacement parts. e.g., mil-spec vs "civilian" buffer-tubes. neither is really better, but mil-spec buffers are a different size, and most AR- stocks are designed for the mil-spec size. Your 100% right that mil-spec standards could be way better, but they still are pretty good. And if you look around, you will likely find some manufacturers that claim "mil-spec or better." The idea, again, being that "mil-spec" is a minimum standard. Hope this helps

Interesting

likewise, many companies claim "built to mil-spec standards" but they are not necessarily mil-spec certified. This is again, just to maintain a level of continuity across the AR-platform, more than anything

I dont believe its so much of an issue now, but 10ish years ago, i remember it being important to look for that mil-spec thing, just because there was a lot of stuff that didnt work reliably too.

So military standard is basically "hey this rifle is made of decent materials and has the right dimensions!"

Whoo got a 100 on my ltc test

Noice

Nice. Still faster than I could probably do lol

I got a question, like just wondering. Sort of want your take on it.

Couldn't have said it better myself buddy. PoB