That is not meditating on the verse and that is an inaccurate interpretation of what the verse is trying to convey than

@chaz @Osha19 you both are right.

Not completely

But points of your arguments are right

@chaz the Leviticus verse for example

Means exactly what you think it does

Eagle you cannot take a verse in the bible and just get a definition from words definitions. Its not a cut clear book.

Homosexuality is a sin.

Based on the teachings of Christianity for thousands of years

But

Jesus preached that all of us sin

For example

Your sin carries as much weight in God’s eyes as a gay man’s

You like

If you lie

That’s just as bad

If you don’t accept someone

That’s just as bad

The moral wrongs of Christianity have the exact same weight

But that weight was carried on the cross

Of course we have to repent and trust in Gid

God*

But it’s not easy

Jesus taught us all to be loving of eachother

Because no-one is without sin

^^

thats not what I am arguing about.

You are arguing about interpretation

Correct?

There’s a verse in Romans, I forget what exact one it is

I agree with eagle of course we should accept gay people

yes. But merely reading a verse without context is not reading a verse.

What chaz was arguing was that homosexuality is not a sin

But it basically talks about how the different beliefs in Christianity. Should be accepted because we are all brothers and sisters in Christ

A good analogy I know is: Trust Jesus like you would a parachute. You’re going to have to jump into eternity, but you don’t know when. Have Jesus like a parachute and you know that when the jump comes, you will be alright.

So if one Christian believes homosexuality Isn’t a sin, then you should accept their beliefs and mind your own

The analogy used had to do with scripture

When two Christians interpret scripture different

It’s basically saying

@Eagle thanks

Accept the person even if they have a different interpretation