Oh yeah for sure.

https://youtu.be/SR4ijvtHe_o

So no discrimination against the alphabet soup group. Ok. But does it end discrimination against straights then? Because that exists too...

I think their aim is to normalize pedophilia

Yeah I can see that.

May as well add P to the alphabet soup group.

Discrimination is just the trojan horse

dear god

so what exactly IS going on?

There is ALWAYS a catch.

maybe the discrimination against the alphabet people is the fact that the laws are not including their incrimination

Yup, more than meets the eye

remember Susan B Anthony did this too

this was her protest

don't hate me

i'm just trying to understand what's going on

Anti discrimination laws are dumb. But, like I said. There's ALWAYS a catch. It's always more than meets the eye.

And considering it's from California, well...

I hate government.

lol

California is going to put a lot of pork into that damn bill.

In essence it'll be the entire bill actually.

I was first upset too when I heard this legislation was passed because it WAS supposed to be a push into anti-discrimination of the alphabet people. It was amended many times however so the original context was pushed out. If you look at the final bill, it doesn't mention the 10 years between age part and it doesn't mention sodomy or vaginal sex. And now it says "person"and not "him or her". You can see that they marked that all out. The bill may have been introduced to make a specific point, but in the end, had a Susan B Anthony effect.

thunderlips posted this over in general-news-chat

https://twitter.com/Kikimamberoy/status/1300181860857901057
https://www.gofundme.com/f/stand-with-sophie?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=p_cp+share-sheet

These people are sick.

the question is who is kourtney in relation to sophie

Yeah it is.

https://youtu.be/oC8nM9CdMmM

the video tells a bigger story

this yt vid

Kids don't just fight like that for a lie...

according to the vid, theres a judge placed gag order on this case

and the videos of the child refusing to go with the mother on the internet is violation of that gag order

according to the judge

and the mother

Of course..

they'd need a new judge on the case considering the current judge is conflicted with a relationship with mother's side already

now that judge could be used for legal advice on the mother's side but cannot be used as legal judge in the active case

If this is true...... holy shit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFbmKAx5Jwo

Every day I hear this stuff the Q stuff is becoming a lot more real to me....