Message from @YeahGirl

Discord ID: 751178828596117594


2020-09-03 08:19:03 UTC  

I can already tell senator weiner passed which bill due to the bills passed.

2020-09-03 08:23:52 UTC  

we seem to have a few weiner problems

2020-09-03 11:52:23 UTC  

Guys please retweet and like this post of a little girl describing how her mom's boyfriend is sexually assaulting her. The judge ruled the mom to get her :C https://twitter.com/SydneyLWatson/status/1300535038631649281?s=20

2020-09-03 14:42:06 UTC  

@pepperfresh The one single thing I’ve heard in defense of SB 145 is that it applies not to people *convicted* of sex crimes, but to people *accused* of sex crimes. People accused, but not convicted, should be protected, it is said.

2020-09-03 15:33:07 UTC  

@YeahGirl The hearing is being streamed rn.

2020-09-03 17:57:26 UTC  

SB-145 did not change statutory rape laws.

2020-09-03 17:58:48 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/746259387072643083/751139138056486922/20200903_010337.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/746259387072643083/751139138312339521/20200903_010413.jpg

2020-09-03 17:59:34 UTC  

@mathgrant people who are accused do not need to register as sex offenders. That is part of the conviction.

2020-09-03 17:59:36 UTC  

The sex offender registry is different than the rape laws.

2020-09-03 18:00:08 UTC  

No one said they were the same

2020-09-03 18:00:47 UTC  

Here in California, with the way it was before SB-145, if you were accused of a sex crime guilty or not, you were stuck in the sex offender registry for life. Now it's a judge that puts you on it.

2020-09-03 18:01:41 UTC  

Can u give me the stature claiming this?

2020-09-03 18:02:37 UTC  

If you dont believe me look it up yourself. But I've lived here my entire life and heard this all the time.

2020-09-03 18:03:37 UTC  

The "all women must be believed" theory really ruined lives.

2020-09-03 18:04:38 UTC  

Ok which stature shall I look up?

2020-09-03 18:10:22 UTC  

It's been there for a long time. Not sure what it's called. Probably been around since the 90s.

2020-09-03 19:34:04 UTC  

so a 20 year old can have sex with a 10 year old and not be put on the registry list, is what im gathering from this

2020-09-03 19:35:07 UTC  

because lgbt rights and all that

2020-09-03 20:36:28 UTC  

@Erby where can i see the update of sophie's case ?:c

2020-09-03 20:37:15 UTC  

its degusting that they are allowing pedophiles not to be registered as sex offenders!

2020-09-03 20:37:51 UTC  

There was a recent zoom hearing earlier today

2020-09-03 20:39:19 UTC  

@YeahGirl this stream is from a lawyer that I follow on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mzXIHwA0mc

2020-09-03 20:39:42 UTC  

Sorry for any unintentional shilling or whatnot.

2020-09-03 21:28:32 UTC  

> because lgbt rights and all that
@Meryl.140.15 Weiner is shamelessly pandering to his base by packaging it that way.

2020-09-03 21:40:43 UTC  

The only person that will benefit is weiner, sb145 is nothing new or groundbreaking (as weiner packages it to be), the age band has always been in the current laws there... it's just an update to the old laws. Now with sb145, discresion is also in the hands of the judge to decide --for what we call "unconventional sex with minors"-- to put the perp in the sex offender register. Weiner is just being a politician and pandering.
I don't think that anyone is saying or implying that sexual activity with a minor is okay and should be allowed; no one is arguing for the decriminalization of sexual abuse.

2020-09-03 22:12:11 UTC  

seems like the politicians are

2020-09-03 22:40:55 UTC  

It's sensationalism for wiener (for more clout). The age difference (ten years), in and of itself is a problem and it's being used as a smoke screen to how young these behaviors are tollerated there. Their current law is geared more towards heterosexuals, and also starts at 14-17 y.o too, and the provisions are only for regular sex that can lead to pregnancy (penile vaginal). Sb145 seems to be geared for homosexuals that have "irregular" sex (penile anal, digit anal, oral whatever, who knows what else, etc...). It seems two wrongs (age and definition of consent) do make a right in cali. Go figure 🤷‍♀️

2020-09-03 23:35:15 UTC  

I think that wiener just repackaged the old laws in effect in cali to pander to his base (the lgbt+ community). He didn't stay up writing this garbage bill.

2020-09-04 00:05:58 UTC  

So glad i left the lgbt community

2020-09-04 00:06:13 UTC  

The left is a fucking cult

2020-09-04 00:14:04 UTC  

Yeah it's easy to throw that out of proportion and Weiner is a terrible guy. He passed a bill a few years ago that decriminalized the intentional spread of HIV virus from people that know they're infected to others. So, people don't have to reveal to their partner that they have HIV.

2020-09-04 00:14:59 UTC  

His argument is that we've moved forward as a culture and so has medicine... And let's not get into the controversial HIV medication.

2020-09-04 00:16:16 UTC  

SB-145 is not what it seems, though. It had a Susan B Anthony effect during the amendment process so i'm totally fine with that. No more of these weird non-binary demi people trying to get away with pedophile because of how laws are written.

2020-09-04 00:17:06 UTC  

I'm surpised the Weiner wasn't trying to take credit for that. But that would give him a bad rep with the weird identity politics people.

2020-09-04 02:52:40 UTC  

there's a GoFundMe for the Sophie child abuse and rape case,
https://www.gofundme.com/f/stand-with-sophie

2020-09-04 02:57:04 UTC  

What are the updates on the case to stand with Sophie?

2020-09-04 02:59:15 UTC  

as far as i know, the police are doing nothing and barely investigating it

2020-09-04 03:01:42 UTC  

So, she has doctor reports that are proving this...

2020-09-04 03:03:56 UTC  

the courts and the police know what is happening, but they are doing nothing about it and siding with the mother