Message from @qwerty_π
Discord ID: 755540066306228275
i live in a dem city ...almost every other ad is joe's
i barely even see a trump ad here
unless some awakened ppl put them up on billboards or some private broadcasting stations put them up
They don't see the same footage we see? The sniffing and the hands.
well the sleeping sheep don't see it
not everybody has internet
they have to choose between tv services or internet ...and some of them even decided to drop tv and internet all together
I guess so. And the people who see it comes down with acute amnesia.
house mate for yrs wanted sat tv in the house....just had to have that connection to multiple channels of content
They've got smart phones π€
those with acute amnesia do so either because of big pharma or they're on welfare and don't want to lose their free funding
That makes sense
technically i don't even own a phone let alone a smart phone...bro loans me his spare when we go shopping
my tv is my pc display so ...that kinda puts out most of the tv content out of the picture of my prevue(tho kitchen has a wall mounted tv over the table)
Still u can see the incriminating evidence of the touching and sniffing that twitter does admit as a violation.
house mate watches tv in the kitchen alot...i see it on when i get food, drinks or do laundry or hit bathroom area
well only so much twitter can do legally....even c-span can fight it
historical record cannot be expunged
even the ppl posting content found on c-span and join in the fight ...to fight the 'fact checkers' that lie
also the twitter can be sued for allowing pro child sexualized content considering they've allowed it so many times in the past, even 'cuties' poster is suggestive
twitter admits it as a "violation", why does the video get taken down....not the guy in the video doing the crime. π€·ββοΈ
the content gets removed...but u can only hit the person involved via legal channels
twitter isn't law enforcement, it's a social media platform...it's supposed to be a platform of free-speech
once they start going the publisher route, and censoring the content even tho it's the truth..they lose any protections legally
btw, 15 days left to sue fb for any past or current free speech violations...they go to full publisher platform next month
Exactly, teflon joe...if it was someone else, they'd be up to their ears with legal documents getting sued.
how do u know they're not already charged and sentenced
u dig deep enough..u notice things...u dig even deeper, u realize ur watching a performance...
I meant joe should be up to his ears with legal documents getting sued.
ppl look close but not exactly alike the ones that did the crime
I guess ur right
I'm not sure if millions did cancel or they're trying to push that idea to encourage people.
Either way. It's any reason to cancel.
I bet I can tell who's been watching it
Biden's been watching it on repeat
WTF, NewsWEAK? The sign of a boycott succeeding or failing is whether people are giving Netflix their money, not whether the thing on Netflix that has made everyone leave Netflix is in the top 5 things people who are staying are watching.
And I'm pretty sure Netflix has lost a π©ton of money.
Also, *defending kids from exploitation should not be a right-wing position only, and the fact that it is proves the left is mentally insane*.
both sides toss vid clips of bad scenes between each other to shitstorm the film and the platform ..but does anybody really watch the film?....is it those in the middle that want to see what all the fucking fuss is about....those that research the problem before choosing any sides?