Message from @Kaladin
Discord ID: 763185085892657183
That’s what he was referencing right?
well back when he had working brain cells they most likely were 14
That’s disgusting, even if it was legal the dude is 79
There isn’t anything you can say to make that comment less weird
Finally
man, I want to beat them with a frozen ham
this puts a smile on my face
indeed
now burn them to the ground
like Georgia
holy cannoli
What the actual ||frick||
Heres the indictment papers for netflix
So who is this actually going to affect? Netflix or like a producer or something?
'did then and there'
could make it illegal for ppl in texas to have netflix acc's
looks like it'll target the higher managment
yeah, bottom looks to be that the CEO and the Chief exec officer are listed as representatives of Netflix, if this goes to a court they'd have to answer for what's going on
also PC 43.262 is worded perfectly for what's going on.
(d) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the depicted child consented to the creation of the visual material.
Given the Grand jury found that Cuties has no artistic value, they have no outs with that code. Not sure what would happen in terms of a punishment
apparently there is precedence for an indictment across states and targeting a company. Using a 2000 indictment from CA against a TX company the Executives listed in the indictment will stand trial against the indictment
And they'll most likely face heavy fines or jail time
Well thought out and written @Tel Locus Appreciate it
barely, I'm not a lawyer and all I can do is look at what's written down. I could be dead wrong for all I know
Didnt say “right”. Said “well thought out and written” 😂
Fair enough.
lol why
What a disgusting little fuck
Maxwell is sure telling them a lot