I’m not sure about that one tbh but I’ve seen a few involving Obama in situations like that.

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1313258394678165506?s=19

https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1313169137640841226?s=19

What the heck?!

We should auction trudeau himself. See how much he's really worth.

Lol, yeah. The woman in the article was auctioned off for three buffaloes and around four hundred bucks.

well the only differences between arraigned marriages and auction marriages is ...who got to the parents first

Yeah dank, doesn't gel right in my oppinion. Probably some traditional thing they got over there. Clash of cultures thing. 🤷‍♀️

alot of the arraigned marriages are rich ppl taking advantage of poor parents or vice versa

Joe Biden probably though those girls looked about 14

That’s what he was referencing right?

well back when he had working brain cells they most likely were 14

That’s disgusting, even if it was legal the dude is 79

There isn’t anything you can say to make that comment less weird

https://www.newsweek.com/cuties-netflix-indictment-backlash-2020-1536816?amp=1&__twitter_impression=true

Finally

https://tenor.com/view/kermit-drinking-justice-tea-gif-11658157

https://twitter.com/MaryMargOlohan/status/1313580557184401409?s=19

man, I want to beat them with a frozen ham

https://youtu.be/sXboCVqBBrQ

this puts a smile on my face

indeed

now burn them to the ground

like Georgia

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1313543352579653633

holy cannoli

What the actual ||frick||

Heres the indictment papers for netflix

So who is this actually going to affect? Netflix or like a producer or something?

Like would Netflix just end up paying a fine or something?

'did then and there'

could make it illegal for ppl in texas to have netflix acc's

looks like it'll target the higher managment

yeah, bottom looks to be that the CEO and the Chief exec officer are listed as representatives of Netflix, if this goes to a court they'd have to answer for what's going on

also PC 43.262 is worded perfectly for what's going on.

(d) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the depicted child consented to the creation of the visual material.

Given the Grand jury found that Cuties has no artistic value, they have no outs with that code. Not sure what would happen in terms of a punishment

apparently there is precedence for an indictment across states and targeting a company. Using a 2000 indictment from CA against a TX company the Executives listed in the indictment will stand trial against the indictment

And they'll most likely face heavy fines or jail time

Well thought out and written @Tel Locus Appreciate it

barely, I'm not a lawyer and all I can do is look at what's written down. I could be dead wrong for all I know

Didnt say “right”. Said “well thought out and written” 😂