Message from @SmokyCopCar
Discord ID: 779577142081749040
They can't attack Buddhism! It's Islamaphobia or something!
When will the left attack Islam
Not anytime soon, they have a "I scratch your back you scratch mine" relationship where Islam provides the votes in exchange for protection, privileges, and power
>_<
Funny how they won't attack Islam and Islam vehemently hates the gay community.
Not all of it obviously but you get what I mean.
I don't know much about Islam but I dunno man, kinda seems a bit mysogynistic to me
Culturally for sure
And it seems to promote the patriarchy the left hates so much
And the left basically says that women are superior to men in all aspects
well, i supposed it depends which version you're looking at -- so maybe that's why i'm bias.
the book i read and from what my mum and gran (who was the head nun and ran a Buddhism center in Florida) taught me, the principles of "no sexual thoughts" are for ALL humans. Not just men. People should aim to rid themselves of mortal qualities to achieve absolute peace, and sexual desire is considered one of them (can't remember what is the punishment in hell for having sexual desires or masturbates, but if you committed that sin you'd pay for it -- regardless of whether you're a man or a woman).
tariq nasheed is fucking insane
we should probably come up with something like that. Buddhophobia?
yes
In that case it'd be brownophobia
I believe it's illegal to masturbate in Indonesia
...imma change the subject now
😅
🙄anyway I'm just going to sit back and watch the left destroy Buddhism
Peace was never an option
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6d-2MzzP0s
The video that people are afraid of watching
He earned my respect
Charlie just destroyed BLM and #Blackouttuesday
charlie kirk is fucking cringe
i thought that said charlie kink <:CursedEmoji:763140778770825247>
<:CursedEmoji:763140778770825247>
yeah, but he's kinda cringe ngl
outside of that video.
no even in that video
his arguments are only against the most radical and idiotic sjws
(aka people that you barely ever meet irl)
Well. Thanks for informing me
Ironically he tries to "utterly pwn" the activists using the exact same tactics they used. That being random snippets of data (I don't have too much of an issue with him on this one because I myself have done the research and read the studies) whilst using ad passiones and ad hominems to beat BLM boogeymen.
If you want someone who actually can consistently make good arguments against BLM (not that it's really difficult to begin with) then I recommend you look into Thomas Sowell.
What about Candace Owens?
she's good too
no
she's pretty much the same as kirk