Message from @Seance Unsean
Discord ID: 780878989413580822
Get out of here with your regurgitation of meme culture.
Inform or stfu
They are even close to Marxist
But in a radical approach.
Hence neo
Nice ad hominem. You must be so proud of your debating skills.
I don’t want cultural or social Marxism, but I’m fine with economic Marxism as long as it works. No system is perfect.
Capitalism is still the better system for now, though. But we’ll see.
Not so sure that it does, though. Or that it's really a fair system
> Nice ad hominem. You must be so proud of your debating skills.
@𝓓. 𝓢.
Your on fire.
Claims personal attacks.
Rebuttal is a personal attack.
👏
If it means we get to overthrow our shadow dictators like Klaus Schwab or George Soros, then sure.
And Seance, attack the idea, not the person.
I mean, advocating for a reduced power government and for economic marxism are not the same thing
I'm all for that.
Hence 90% of my comments are ideological debate based.
Does cherry get that same comment?
😏
Since I grew up in Germany, I’m reminded of the Kristallnacht whenever I think of Antifa. Whatever you want to call them, they’re a violent terrorist group that obviously hasn’t read enough about history.
Although, perhaps they have read a little too much history. As President Reagan once said, our liberal friends aren’t stupid. They just know so much that isn’t so.
Liberals aren’t stupid for sure. They are playing the stupid game only
They are pretending to be stupid while really being absolute genius evildoers
I guess so.
There is the original antifa, maybe circa 2019 then is there is the coopted antifa.
It has been perverse media manipulation recently.
If *you* think your side has seen media manipulation, then welcome to the club
Perhaps yes, perhaps no.
Although, when I used to be a liberal, I really thought I was fighting for the right cause. I wasn’t really trying to be evil.
Don’t worry, I’m not talking about liberal people, I’m talking about liberal politicians and leaders
Liberal people want the best from others I am certain
It's kind of interesting how far we have come from classical 60s-style liberalism to the dumpster fire we have today - and arguably around the late 60s with the radical feminists
Yeah that liberalism was way better
Modern liberalism is just... no thank you!
I still stand by what I said earlier. If you join a violent terrorist organization, you forfeit your life. That’s just my point of view. Those kids may just be misinformed, but isn’t every terrorist misinformed?
Arguably, a lot of modern liberalism isn't even liberalism by the standards of people in the 60s - evident by the fact that the ideology of MLK himself is now considered right-wing by the neo-liberals
I would argue you forfeit your life when you show that you are willing to take others' lives away because of what they believe in.
All is fair in love and war. If you go out and get violent, you cannot complain when people fight back. Attacking unprovoked is a whole other story
Wait what? How is it right-wing to believe in treating people by their content rather than by their skin?
What the hell?
Most political compass tests place it that way, yeah. Kind of sad really. But, when you consider intersectionality and affirmative action, it kind of makes sense
I tend to side with cornel west on the spectrum of political ideologies plaguing america atm, and his breakdown of the situation on the streets atm.
In a world of constructed images, meaning and depth holds little weight anymore.
Meme culture prevails.
So it’s progressive to be positively racist, wow.
I love this “progress”, woohoo. 😒
It seems like modern day "progressivism" is just "progressing" further left. Whereas, via the classical definition, it would just be the ideology of moving forward with science - which almost everybody agrees with
Or, not necessarily with science, but you get what I mean
The accepted norm?