because they don't know if their talking about their own expression or their own genes

yea it's a social construct but is it even practical to categorize it to more than 2 genders?

idk sounds like theyre trying to divide us farther

Dude is straight up saying gender has nothing to do with biology. Means there is no scientific basis for it.

I dont consider neutral a gender

He is right. I dont know what he means by individual sexuality

He is also right about language evolving over time. But got lucky that English did. I doubt other languages will do the same

not only because it causes more confusion but they would literally have to change everything to fit this

He mentions a billion personalities too. I'm not sure if he means they are genders or to prove theres more than 2 genders

When he says catagorize into 2, everyone has different levels of masculinity and femininity. I dont see how inaccurate it is since what's the point of making it 6

Maybe I misunderstood idk

They also mention why xx and xxx chromosomes arent the same and should be a different sex. Why though? When has it been useful to catagrozie on as that

Dont mistake gender and sex

I know the difference between the 2.

Theres two sexes, male or female, difference being reproductive and biological functions

@2Lazy2BeOriginal I was talking to @KirkpattieCake

Oh ok

I think he means that sex influences gender greatly

Not too sure

Well technically there's 2 and a half genders; male, female, and hermaphrodites. Tho herms are extremely rare and make up less than 1% of the population

Gender is mostly socially constructed

wouldn't say they are a different sex. Just abnormal

That's what I said. there's only sperm and egg. Everything else is a mutation. There are two sexes and any mutation is still within either sperm or egg influence

Hermaphrodite isn't a different sex/gender. They still abide by presenting male or female.

It wouldn't be practical to say hermaphorodites as a different sex

A woman shaving her head and wearing lipstick and a flannel does not some how change her being a sperm or an egg, and x or a y, a male or a female. Gender expression is not science.

Well thats why i said technically 2 and a half sex's

You were saying the "dude" is saying gender has nothing to do with biology. Whoever this dude is, is right, gender is social, sex biological, simplest way to remember it

Meanwhile in other languages: :|

Question: If genetic mutations that create hermaphrodites or other sexual reproduction abnormalities creates 'new genders,' that are backed by science, what have these people to say on the genetic differences between ethnicities? Are different racial classes actually entirely different species because of differences in biology?

Again... gender is social, sex is biological

A lot of things you cant choose. Like age and race and gender except in English. I dont see how practical it is

Gender is a social contruct crafted by a French female scientist in the 50's as a theory, and daid theory would be tested in the 70's by an american scientist with 2 young boys, one of which he forced to be dressed and acted as female and the other raised as a male. this experiment would ultimately lead to both committing suicide later in life

That's one of the problems in this conversation. SOME people argue gender is biological

Some don't

We can't even have an actual conversation on an issue if the rules are not set to talk about the same thing

Hmm would they have committed suicide if they weren't forced? Or felt pressured to

p sure there was gender theory going on in 1930s Germany

Its pretty established that gender is social, many people use the word wrong which is why people think that way

I can get around the idea of transgender. is there a lot of theories of non binary?