u do understand the concept of 'sleeper cells' ...right ..it's based upon structure of the internet ...if 1 node goes down, other nodes pick up the slack and take over

Go google their organization

a 'web structure' ...like the world wide web....has thousands/millions of nodes. but in this case, sleeper cells have anywhere from a dozen to a few hundred depending on the support system and funding prior to it's creation

It's not like the "antifa" of the 1940s, they've morphed into more of an alqaeda/isis structure (cells).

u mean the antifa of the 1930's

they suddenly formed up against those nations trying to recover from the great depression

and yes, they had more structure than u knew

they were in plenty of nations ...most of them in the former soviet block nations

those that resisted communism for as long as they could, got attacked from within by the antifa factions operating in those nations...it wasn't just germany ...poland resisted several attempts

as well as a few other nations if u dig hard enough(don't use google)

That was then

well wireless comms became more available ....also internet so their structure improved over time to adapt to new tools and weapons

alqaeda/isis blossomed because not all the tools were used to stop them.

til trump came along and unlocked the military response to them

jammers been around for decades before alqaeda/isis were formed..but for some reason they weren't used

They depend on having a cadre of activists who can operate in the shadows (terrorist sleeper cells) with little risk that they will be found or exposed to the scrutiny of the government, and by the People. The core ethos of this "weaponized protest design" is to ensure that peripheral mayhem accompanies peaceful activity just out of reach of the police. It makes the cops look incompetent and makes the public feel vulnerable.

They've come a long way to their so called 1930s ancestry. Antifa then wouldn't recognize the antifa now

well the antifa back then were ruthless

the antifa now is basically pathetic compared to the old ones

isis was more of a threat than the antifa operating on usa soil

antifa back then would go out of their way to murder ppl

police, gov elect, gov officials

even whole families along borders with soviets

They know that their numbers are far too low to incite a revolution. Their only choice is to implode the system (the earmarks of terrorism). The "antifa" name they use today is probably only a name they've hijacked. They can call themselves spaghetti if they want, we need to look deeper.

well the freedom of the internet worked against their programming narrative

if they had another decade or so also no internet for everybody...to work out their programming of the youth of usa and the world...they might have done it ...but too many factions doing greedy things screwed it all up

yea now that the videos of them with burn loot murder terrorists throwing molotovs have surfaced, they are fucked for the moment

the antifa of old worked on stealth ...only the evidence of their actions let ppl confused without any evidence pointing directly to them...but modern tech and internet clearly points all the evidence directly to them now

which is why every time theres violent action..other than peaceful protests....involves arrests

This is why the covid plandemic (the wearing of masks) tied in with the blm "peaceful protesting" works so well for antifa. To paralel military strategy, this is a classic variation of "fire and maneuver". You use one element of your force to fix the enemy in position so that the other element can skirmish at will with little resistance (making the cops look vulnerable). And then, just like special forces, you pull out prior to superior forces being able to muster and engage you. They've trained with hamas, antifa's strategy comes straight out of the hamas playbook.

well the blm didn't resurface til 'floyd' incident

and already at the time..there were lockdown protests going on for a few days

they thought they'd exploit the numbers

also notice it only happened in dem cities/states

i predicted that blm was going to be a huge "issue" in the 2020 elections last year. nobody believed me

though at this point, it shouldn't surprise anyone

they pulled the same stunt in 2016 <:ee:623022947220586507>

blm surfaced first during obama....actually much earlier than 2016

i know that. it just always spikes during elections

the blm/antifa surfaced in 2016 when 'trump' looked to be more popular than hrc

you mean killary <:ee:623022947220586507>