because if he had durring the debat millions more would argee with you

debate

he was sued for breaking the 15th though

He's done so so many times that it's fucking ridiculous at this point.

Don’t forget fake fact checking by the so use full cnn

I mean such a contribution to us right

he was sued for breaking the 15th though

@chaz I'm going to sue you for defamation. Does that mean you defamed me?

Also, what portion of the 15th Amendment is the claim brought under?

sorry 14th,

😰

he was sued because he harresed black tenants in his hotels in nyc

Okay, so back to my first question. If I sue you on the basis of defamation, does it make it true?

I do not know but i can do some research

No. Just because someone is sued for something doesn't make it true. I could sue everybody I ever met with frivolous lawsuits and never have a single lawsuit make it to court because a lack of any legal basis or facts. There is a legal basis for what you are claiming, under the Fair Housing Act and the 14th Amendment, but this case never made it any where because there were no facts to back it up.

true, but i though he had to pay, i read the article literaly years ago though

https://www.npr.org/2016/09/29/495955920/donald-trump-plagued-by-decades-old-housing-discrimination-case

Nope. It was settled and the result was adding different language regarding the fair housing act in their ads, but as far as this article mentions, there was not payment.

It happened in the 70s, though.

Yeah.... even if it were true, it would've been a very different time in history.

true but if you look at election people are bringin up thing biden did in the seventies

And that's why I wouldn't make that argument lol. Because racism, no matter how long ago, is still racism.

so both canditates are rascist, cool

Except you can see that's clearly not the case right there.

oh, but it is

or bot where 40 years ago

Still waiting for real evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ2O35TQ3Y8&ab_channel=LawTelevision

rather old, but epic video

without more context i would condemn the police

not over all just these ones

They were standing in the middle of the street illegally and were disobeying orders to move to the sidewalk so that traffic could pass through.

uh, the street is public space, so doesn't that mean they have the right to protest?

correct me please

if i am wrong

Blocking traffic is illegal.

^

The sidewalks are for you to walk on and protest on,

the streets are for driving

Unless you have a permit and they close the street for you and redirect people.

Yes. Peaceful protest good, burn, loot, murder bad

thank you, for the the context, i still do not think bum rushing them is proper, but thank you for correcting me