Message from @Tel Locus

Discord ID: 724949327893495839


2020-06-23 11:25:42 UTC  

if so then perjury is not an impeachable offense

2020-06-23 11:25:50 UTC  

than you Billy

2020-06-23 11:26:06 UTC  

?

2020-06-23 11:26:17 UTC  

Bill Clinton's impeachment case

2020-06-23 11:26:24 UTC  

Welcome, <@!248602935330603008>.

2020-06-23 11:26:36 UTC  

they ruled that perjury isn't enough of an offense to be impeachmment over

2020-06-23 11:26:59 UTC  

found it, the Samuel Chase impeachment trial

2020-06-23 11:26:59 UTC  

I was referring to Judges being removed/impeached for abiding to political influence

2020-06-23 11:27:23 UTC  

They are not suppose to be political in any way.

2020-06-23 11:27:30 UTC  

That's why they have the terms they have.

2020-06-23 11:28:14 UTC  

basically Samuel Chase was tried for ruling with political bais

2020-06-23 11:28:24 UTC  

Ohhh

2020-06-23 11:28:28 UTC  

I see now

2020-06-23 11:28:50 UTC  

He was the CJ for the Clinton trial

2020-06-23 11:28:52 UTC  

?

2020-06-23 11:29:01 UTC  

I honestly don't know who the CJ was at that time.

2020-06-23 11:29:07 UTC  

CJ?

2020-06-23 11:29:12 UTC  

Chief Justice.

2020-06-23 11:29:27 UTC  

no gods no, Samuel Chase was a Jefferson era judge

2020-06-23 11:29:48 UTC  

yeah that guy

2020-06-23 11:30:30 UTC  

I spent ages combing through old records reading up on that case

2020-06-23 11:32:04 UTC  

William Rehnquist...He was CJ

2020-06-23 11:32:12 UTC  

yeah

2020-06-23 11:32:13 UTC  

During the Clinton Impeachment trial

2020-06-23 11:32:28 UTC  

sorry if I got confusing trying to info dump before work

2020-06-23 11:33:09 UTC  

overall the chase impeachment trials kinda make it hard to remove judges for political bias

2020-06-23 11:35:02 UTC  

Seems to me that in the Chase case, political bias wouldn't count under "high crimes and misdemeanors" and wasn't an "indictable offense".

2020-06-23 11:37:13 UTC  

Ideally, though, judges should be impartial...

2020-06-23 11:37:25 UTC  

Though I'm definitely not a lawyer just like legal smackdowns

2020-06-23 11:37:36 UTC  

Flynn did a doozy a few days ago

2020-06-23 11:38:40 UTC  

I honestly didn't keep up with it. What was the doozy?

2020-06-23 11:39:02 UTC  

The response just hammered the Amicus

2020-06-23 11:39:23 UTC  

Just read through the Case impeachment trial... yeah that doesn't just suck, it's actually scary.

2020-06-23 11:39:52 UTC  

And then cited the same judge that wrote it as to why everything should be dropped

2020-06-23 11:41:21 UTC  

Still though, a Judge cannot use a prosecutor to give an anecdotal backlash and most certainly cannot ACT as a prosecutor. These 2 things are now textbook illegal and go into indictment territory. This Judge Sullivan is playing with fire.

2020-06-23 11:41:42 UTC  

The former of what I mentioned was ruled into law by the Surpreme Court about a month ago.

2020-06-23 11:41:53 UTC  

it's in the conclusion

2020-06-23 11:42:43 UTC  

I would love to see the DoJ actually go after Judge Sullivan with indictments 🤣

2020-06-23 11:43:00 UTC  

They have sufficient public record to do it.