it's in the conclusion

I would love to see the DoJ actually go after Judge Sullivan with indictments 🤣

They have sufficient public record to do it.

A federal judge once wrote:
[A] prosecutor can do justice by the simple act of going back
into court and agreeing that justice should be done. * * *
It is easy to be a tough prosecutor. Prosecutors are almost
never criticized for being aggressive, or for fighting hard to
obtain the maximum sentence, or for saying "there's
nothing we can do" about an excessive sentence after all
avenues of judicial relief have been exhausted. Doing
justice can be much harder. It takes time and involves
work, including careful consideration of the circumstances
of particular crimes, defendants, and victims—and often
the relevant events occurred in the distant past. It requires
a willingness to make hard decisions, including some that
will be criticized.
This case is a perfect example. * * *
By contrast, the decision []he has made required
considerable work. Assistant United States Attorney . . .
had to retrieve and examine a[n] . . . old case file. . . . He
requested and obtained an adjournment so his office could
have the time necessary to make an extremely important
decision. United States Attorneys' offices work with limited
resources. The effort that went into deciding whether to
agree to vacate [two counts against defendant] could have
been devoted to other cases. * * *
This is a significant case, and not just for [the defendant].
It demonstrates the difference between a Department of
Prosecutions and a Department of Justice. It shows how
the Department of Justice, as the government's
representative in every federal criminal case, has the
power to walk into courtrooms and ask judges to remedy
injustices.

Gleeson wrote this in response to Loretta Lynch

crap, I gtg to work. I lost track of time

crap, same

Would people here be interested in trying to form local meet ups? Matt Christensen channel did that for his viewers. I'd like to get other creators on board. Does anyone like the idea?

I think that would be interesting.

Would be

I laughed at Tyler's last video who wants to carpool with me to chop?

Anyone else just what's project veritas FB vid?

Watch*

Hippity hoppity your kid is my property

-Joe biden

Oof

~~to be fair it was the guy farting into the intercom that got me first~~

tf? 😂

<:anaconWave:722994652243951687>

<a:beardybop:715671060292436089>

<:NPC:720120095581405256>

<:iccywojak:720003669700902932>

<:anaconL:465692711031275520>

And that would be a rough week...





For them

What?

Poor Domino's

lmao

What's happening to them now?

I guess it’s okay for Antifa and BLM to destroy shit all over the country but as soon as something happens in DC they get stopped in their tracks <:emoji_10:723010351150661655>

I've got mixed thoughts about it...I'm all for stopping them in their tracks at the White House, but most of the "peaceful" riots are going on in big cities with Democrat leadership that enables it. So, part of me would rather they get what they vote for. On the other hand, I'd also rather see it stopped in its tracks elsewhere. The problem is the leadership elsewhere is doing nothing about it...

Sleep?

Trump 2030

Trump 2020

Trump 2030? O_o

Lmao

Abolish the 22nd amendment<:CrazyAOC:720122172470722570>

A public servant should be able to be elected for as long as the people want him

<:emoji_10:723010351150661655>

imagine getting salty a president was so popular that he got re-elected three times instead of two, so you abolish more than two terms

"W-what if Teddy wins a f-fourth time?!"

<:emoji_9:723005092764319776> <:emoji_9:723005092764319776>