@ClaudeBlanche of the ballot or how it's set up? Because the set up also kinda varies by state. It was different when I was voting in MD for example when I lived there

Oh nevermind didn't realize you meant the rally

ok... so she's pro abortion on some aspects and also anti abortion... what...?

In the end you do what you think is right no one can stop you

wasnt asking for the ballot pic but cool to know

Well she is leaving it up to the states no? Which means that she is okay with whatever the states rules @米饭和面条

or hear me out, she's a **libertarian** and believes that federal authority shouldn't have so much power

I will say as far as abortion I prefer it being up to the states in a way. It means we don't have the federal government meddling in what different places have to do.

@Superboy prime whether that is the general platform position on abortion, Jo Jorgenson's own statement is "Individuals own their bodies and have rights over them that other individuals, groups, and governments may not violate." So her standpoint is very much pro-abortion, since she is stating that nobody can make a law on the basis

libertarians are all about smaller government, which means less rules and more free market

@Froski I said she was pro abortion lol

how is bodily autonomy pro abortion?

did you just admit you think babies are part of a woman's body?

@米饭和面条 It isn't a woman's body, but bodily autonomy is a pro-abortion argument.

it's a stupid argument to make about being pro abortion

Or at least, it gets twisted into a pro-abortion argument quite frequently

yeah what part of a woman's body can separate, grow up and become its own person?

........

lol

@米饭和面条 I see what you're saying about abortion and Federal government but this isn't a power issue you are literally denying the right to life or potential to life on the issue of abortion.

you don't know my position on abortion

don't pretend like you do

he didn't pretend to know, Ghost was just acknowledging your point

......

nani

abortion is clearly murder who here disagrees

Not me

@米饭和面条 I am not talking to you directly dude its in general.

then don't say "you"

yes

Yes.

yeppers.

"potential of life" is a stupid argument

and it's already life imo dude

Yes

life starts at conception

the second egg and sperm meet, there's new DNA formed

animals are life too

there is no "potential of life" at that point. At conception it literally is life.

not human life though, obviously