All this proves is that Gabriel Sterling is not technical. Dominion provides an option for connecting a modem to their voting machines - because some jurisdictions require the ability to transfer information electronically. It is an option that GA did not purchase.

The funny thing is that whoever made this video is probably not very technical either and the Dr. that testified chose his words carefully - there is a difference between a virus and a cyber attack. A virus infection could render a system inoperable or destroy data, but it cannot create a phantom connection to the Internet to send data out or allow a connection in. The vast majority of viruses today are transmitted via the Internet.

Also, voting machines can be connected to a local area network (LAN) so that machines can communicate with each other via a switch. It is possible to connect a router to a switch that would theoretically connect the LAN to the Internet. The problem is that the Dominion systems are configured for a LAN and are not configured with a default route or a DNS server for name resolution. The router would have to be configured for the same subnet definition as the LAN and the PC network configuration would have to be modified to take advantage of it.

Holy shit, is it real that Biden only won 477 counties vs Trump's 2497?

Nothing to see here

interesting stuff here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tArtYkILiHc

For reference, I don't think a "hack" occurred. I believe every instance of vertical gain in votes and the other numerous errors all for one candidate that we witnessed were just a glitch *cough cough* , those unfortunate glitches.

And human error.

Similar to the kind of error like when a robber points a gun at you and to give him the money....
The error was saying no, and having it taken anyway.

So glitches, and human errors. I don't believe there was a hack.

Only math... It has been trending this way for more than a century is all.

I think that someone might have been able to isolate the Polling Pad traffic using a packet sniffer - that traffic is likely encrypted (otherwise they would have been able to tell you what was being transmitted via the captured packets).

They may have been able to establish an external connection to the router that was being used at the polling location (if they were using the WiFi provided at the arena, then they are just stupid, because that would be an insecure connection by definition).

Assuming they weren't that dumb, I doubt that they would be able to make a connection all the way back to the pad, because they are likely using port address translation through the router and an RFC 1918 reserved subnet address on the LAN side, which is not directly routable on the Internet.

I'm not saying anything anymore out of deference to the EPIC BOMBSHELL evidence that will DESTROY dems, rinos and CCP shills on 01/06. I suggest you do the same. @TaLoN132

Mum's the word...

She Jumping wins?

Do you have to be a computer wiz if the machine itself wasn't even sealed as it was supposed to be?

O my Gurd!

Go to everylegalvote.com and you can take action by sending an automated email to all members of congress demanding that they look into the voter fraud surrounding the November 3rd election. Over 35 million people have already done so.

lol delusional chat. two are two different machines.

you do that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoALF4JfwHg

Trump making sure one of 300,000 fake Trump ballots fed properly out of Melania's machine. Fraud.

Different angles not different machines

Pretending is fun.

But is there any evidence?

They have different tags on top. The one on the left ends in 2. The one on the right ends in 1

No doubt @Zuluzeit


https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/risk-false-results-curative-sars-cov-2-test-covid-19-fda-safety-communication

Who needs evidence when you have allegations and accusations?

Exactly.

One shows what it's supposed to look like. An (((example))) of a propoerly sealed machine.

The picture to the right was taken by someone at the location showing they weren't sealed properly.

i don't even know why i'm debunking this.

Your yellow circles have debunked nothing. One image is further away from the machine therefore shows more parts.

So I agree I don't even know why you're ||TRYING|| to debunk it.

And a red circle proves election fraud.

Did I say that

i said it. read.

That is not the seal... That is a missing tag. The seal is the device attached to the lock on the left that looks like the security tag you would find on a garment in a store. You can see it clearly going through the lock were one might put a padlock on the right side.

It shows a machine not sealed as it should be at the voting location. Period.

yes because you were ther and took the picture.

Read previous message... It's just someone that doesn't know the difference between a seal and a tag.

call the election fraud hotline.

Improperly tagged makes it better?

they should have left the machines at the local bowling alley.