NY, CO, and MI did not require a signature during registration

But they did require a signature on the voting ballot

You’re thinking in terms of honorable people, who uphold their oaths... most would say it’s clearly not the case (especially with what’s happened this last few months)

I believe MI has since updated its registration process, not sure if CO and NY have too

Here in AZ there was 2000 plus mail in votes from one address

Some use the DL signature - like GA.

Probably something similar https://youtu.be/tArtYkILiHc

Yeah... There are lots of rumors. I would like to see that assertion in a court filing. They had 6 cases in AZ, I think... So it should be easy to find.

The big problem was to say theres no vote fraud 0 and not even possible

I was able to register in CO even though I never lived there, registered before, have no CO drivers license, no CO address, etc. But I couldn’t register in NC because they required in-person registration, and you were required to have a NC issued ID to do it (unless you got some exemption signed from the state commission or something)

For me, it is the lack of arrests. After 9 weeks, they should have been able to make some cases - if not hundreds that would account for major fraud.

Only boneheads and trolls say that.

It was found and will find more ..this was time issue and it was work that way

Arrest for what

That would be admitting to fraud. CO just prosecuted that guy who voted for his wife. - They found out about it because she requested an absentee ballot because she was out of town. So they must do some checks.

Idk, voter fraud charges are EXTREMELY discretionary - I don’t think almost any DAs would bring those right now.

if at all

I am on overload right now and I'm confused what did you agree with or disagree with about what I said?

To be clear, I was able to, but I did not actually register. 😉

Where in code is election fraud

And, if hypothetically I did, it would only be fraud if I did not move to CO in the months following registration

ARS ???

But with the stakes and a $210m legal fund and every law enforcement agency in the country endorsing Trump, you would think there would have been some motivation to expedite investigations, right?

WHy and undermind the system

This would simk most election for last 10yr plus

I was responding to:

“...Let's stop telling them to shut up and let's investigate a little bit. The Constitution allows for this, so let's do it!”

That was a good point (assuming you meant performing forensic audits)

@meglide saw that video. Elijah. Why is a Metro Police woman behind a 4feet barricade with 100000 .crazy Maga . Fans coming at you..
Looks to me she got send to get beaten

My gut agrees with you. I hesitate because it would be indicating gaps in their OWN states system, which I don’t think ANY state is willing to do right now with a trigger-happy president who might sue you to get the votes thrown out. But I think you’re probably right, especially for right-leaning states.

YES!! Thank you! Don't get me wrong, I care about this election, but my MUCH bigger concern is future elections.

this is how it works keep it quite and fix it without know one seeing it done

like pay n taxs what judge would say yes you dont have pay only during times of war

I’ll say it again - if the system could have been rigged to swing the vote, I’m surprised Trump didn’t get himself a piece of that

I would be interested in your thoughts about the idea that the "power that be" would be especially determined to undermine the election outcome if the systems proved to be too secure. https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/796587342148272148

lol

everone would want there $$ back

Doesn’t everyone already want their $$ back?

no im happy with 6 dollars

They're lucky they didn't go hog wild @18:24 in the clip

(they) being law enforcement.

i want off shore $$ for retirement funds for congress