judges can be pretty corrupt, when u mix lawyer and politician it gets interesting, no offense to either

But there isn’t evidence the entire judicial system from all political leanings are corrupt

slick Ted Cruz is an example, ppl think he is a hero now.. do nothing joke that goes along to get along, better than someone that hates America though

Alex Jones 2024 🤣

Don’t need the entire system to be corrupt, just people at the top

The judges at the top are very pro Trump they did him a massive favor

there will never be evidence of anything anymore, bushs, clintons, obama/biden.. pack of traitors and criminals allowed to get away with selling out America and warmongering globally

The scotus blowing up Trumps cases in no way helps him make his case

there isn’t evidence Chewbacca defense!

America gets away with everything. No Americans were charged with war crimes after the atom bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Why on gods green earth do you imagine the us Supreme Court picking up junk cases and ruling against them helps you lol

"junk cases" tell us more...

Letting unconstitutional changes to our laws stand is evidence of that corruption

The state legislature can only alter election laws, not Secretary Bookcvar or the courts

to stop patriots from trying to deliver justice by their own hands, like i said they are lucky it was mostly peaceful and they didnt burn the building or tear down statues like leftists

In your “expert opinion of PA state law”. Please 🤦‍♂️

Not my opinion

I’m glad we agree then

That was easy

We don’t. It’s the opinion of experts

Let me get a read here.

Scenario: A swastika makes the mainstream news.

Is it more likely to be a hate crime or a hoax?

Maybe you should reread the PA scotus decision

I have. They used laches as an excuse — too late to file a suit therefore we don’t review the case

Laches is crucial in that case because laches makes it a constitutional issue

Nope. No SCOTUS justice endorsed laches

A Hoax of a Hate crime? no evidence nope never happen never!

what about the merits of the fraud allegations?

On September 11, 2020, the PA Department of State issued the following guidance after a court settlement: "The Pennsylvania Election Code does not authorize the county board of elections to set aside returned absentee or mail-in ballots based solely on signature analysis by the county board of elections.”

Pennsylvania Election Code requires that, for non-disabled and non-military voters, all applications for an absentee or mail-in ballot “shall be signed by the applicant.” 25 PA. statute sections 3146.2(d) & 3150.12(c). Also, Pennsylvania’s voter signature verification requirements are expressly set forth at 25 PA statute. 350(a.3)(1)-(2) and section 3146.8(g)(3)-(7). This guidance unconstitutionally did away with statutory signature requirements required by PA law. In addition, the guidance violated article II, section 1.2 of the US Constitution, which states that electors from each state must appointed in the manner prescribed by the STATE LEGISLATURES, not Secretary of State Boockvar or the judicial branch

Are you under the impression the PA constitution only has one thing in it?

Revolutionary war 2 😂🤷🍿

Sorry I couldn’t help myself. 😂

article 1 "No evidence" works for me you good @AOH_Assassin ???

That is PA law.

Maybe maga meant pre revo war all along

funny but... England cant even take Rhode Island sorry

PA constitution protects voter rights.

lol too soon?

even dead voter rights lol

All state constitutions are clear that only legislatures can alter or make new laws, not the courts, and not Bookcvar

Basic civics from Middle School