Message from @Maw
Discord ID: 797118966949478421
S'what an analogy is.
Keep in mind, I'm pro-life. I think it's people's own responsibility to take risk reducing measures to avoid abortions, but it's a very similar argument.
And I keep my principles as principles.
I don't selectively apply principles. Kinda counter-intuitive to having a principle.
Yes and I don't take the blame off of them. I would emphasize the people leading tho as most responsible whoever they were
Everyone is responsible that engages in the mob mentality.
Everyone has personal choice.
"you shall not follow a mob in doing violence" Moses
Agreed.
Therefore it's no excuse.
Ex 23:2 You shall not fall in with the many to do evil, nor shall you bear witness in a lawsuit, siding with the many, so as to pervert justice,
@Maw ok, here. Vaccinations are geared toward an individual person. Which if given a choice to take or not to take could only affect themselves personally, even though one might say that the person could affect others by their choice.
While Abortion involves more than one person when the choice is made. The Mother and the Unborn child which is the initial while after the choice is made others affected are numerous. Though, there are certain situations where it could be understood and is consider just. It is a case by case issue on Abortion.
I follow the same principles as Oliver Wendell Holmes, one of the best associate justices in American history for the first amendment and topics of liberty. "Your freedom ends where my rights begin." Or as he put it: "Your liberty to swing your fist ends where my nose begins."
Incorrect. Vaccinations' primary goal is to create herd immunity and protect other people.
by the way... the only word doubled down on in Moses books is justice.... Justice, justice shall you pursue. Due 16:20
@Maw now i like that quote
case by case case law is fine
If you want to stay inside your home and never interact with society in a way that creates a vector risk for transferable disease, by all means you shouldn't be required to be vaccinated. I can easily make the argument that if you want to interact with society on a person-to-person basis, that states (specifically the state, and not the federal level) can make you opt into an agreement where you are required to take a vaccine to engage in person-to-person activity with society.
Either agree or not agree, you have that choice.
sorry... the vaccinations only address the spike DNA and actually doesn't give immunity the vaccination lessen the impact if you get it
The basic concepts of a vaccine are that sequences of RNA are introduced to create an immune system response.
This vaccination doesn't give immunity
Isn’t this an election forum?
At the moment it's the politics channel, and policy is politics.
As I was saying:
Fair fair.
The RNA sequence that was chosen was its unique spike protein, which while it's a narrow-in-scope vaccination that makes it hard to achieve long-term immunity, it's still effective at creating short to medium-term immunity when taken multiple times.
? I'm getting sent to my PMs with Robert whenever I click that.
Reposted content, not link 👍🏼👍🏼
Think of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as repeating a name to yourself multiple times in effort to remember the name better, but only part of the name.
This part of the name can be shared with other names however, so you don't want to keep this in memory forever.
Texit, Flexit, Wyxit, SoDaxit 🙂
@gjblajian, you just advanced to level 1!
Basically!
Your antibodies go and say "hey I know what this is, and I can fit with it because I have a memory of this thing and it's bad!" so they go and attach, and your immune system sees the antibody and destroys the cell the antibody is attached to. Now, keep in mind, this includes the names that contain the part of the name you have in memory.
Will most likely say something that breaks tos by the end of today
Trumps started off right at the edge
