@MatiLuc That's a fair point.

Fired?

They didn't get searched for weapons.. bombs..

Likely promoted

Is police 101. Search

Being an effective police officer and working peacefully with the public

https://youtu.be/MNIxatQ0fKU

Do you have any proof that the selfie cop did not search those in his immediate area?

Or are you just making up a narrative?

Because if you are going to call for someone to lose their job and any future employment I feel as if you should have proof

Haha now apps saying they have a right to be in an App Store 😂

> Haha now apps saying they have a right to be in an App Store 😂
@Dedkraken Yeah they don't. Business decisions.

Selective enforcement of policies, making up rules as you go, different rules for different people because of political views

I think what's happening well eventually be for the good. You'll see more competition among the tech companies possibly government break up of some of the monopolies that have occurred. I mean we saw the government do this to Microsoft now it looks like it's Amazon Google and Facebook's turn

Violence and extremism isn’t a right wing platform

@mg216 watch the video. I was watching live

You can’t force a company to adopt your views because you politically believe you are special

Correct there's more of it on Twitter then just about any other platform

That’s silly Parler was very clearly and openly allowing the spread and planing of the violence that culminated in an attack on our nations capital

Apple and google if doing nothing about it risk backlash coming back on them financially

As was Twitter

Businesses can put profit above hypocrisy as they see fit. Let the market sort it out, as is my understanding.

Twitter stepped up with the bans Parler said do whatever you want it’s a free country. Apple and google followed their advice

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/us/politics/trump-pelosi-nuclear-military.html

no double standards at all... right https://twitter.com/YoDatElefent/status/1347619566130659328

Twitter bans have been selected based on political views. If you have a certain political view you're given a lot more leeway in terms of policy enforcement. And if your political views different then they look for excuse to ban you. That's pretty obvious.

Pelosi trying to get that coup going for real

literally kneel for BLM rioters that burned cities, but a selfie shot, probably trying to make the situation peaceful is so bad lol

> Twitter bans have been selected based on political views. If you have a certain political view you're given a lot more leeway in terms of policy enforcement. And if your political views different then they look for excuse to ban you. That's pretty obvious.
@meglide Agreed...also, their prerogative.

Companies can have political views. Chick filla is gay hating chickens. Fox hates accuracy in news.

Also whiny and overblown progressives constantly get their shit wrecked by Facebook YouTube Twitter

But a gay guy can still buy a chicken sandwich at Chick-fil-A just like everybody else.

But he might not want to based on the companies views.

Or he might like Popeye's Chicken sandwich better

But probably just wants a delicious chicken sandwich regardless

Unless its sunday

No chicken on sunday

Are you saying Popeye's isn't delicious?

Its scientific fact that popeyes is an inferior product

Nobody is forcing conservatives to use social media platforms they think are liberal but actually aren’t

Agree but let's dispense with the nonsense that it's all because of policy enforcement. Something like we can just ban you because of any reason no matter what. You have no civil rights you have no civil liberties on our platform. That would be both a true and refreshing policy statement.