Right. On January 6th the want to say “he stole it! We warned you! He’s a dictator! Take to the streets”

Precisely

yup

He's the most benevolent dictator in history

only "dictator" to reduce regulation and relinquish power to the states... didn't even use a "global pandemic" to exercise control.

By dictator standards he's pretty shitty

Only thing he’s bad at

Did we add New Mexico?

Based

https://tenor.com/view/mortal-kombat-trump-gif-10268122

Hate to bring negative news but

Supreme Court is fucking up

eh, don't think that was a crucial play tbh

there are far, far stronger (even slam-dunk) cases to be made

Wanna bet it got thrown out from a technicality again?

<:thinking:445724717450526731>

They dont legislate from the bench for fucks sake

Not the conservatives anyways

They don't NEED TO. They need to do their damn jobs

Are part of SCOTUS's job is arbitration between states. Which would have been the Texas suit, but they refused to hear it because they don't want to become "political".

Spineless cowards the lot of them. ACB and Kavanaugh.

They said TX doesn't have "standing" (at that time)... suit can and is being made by those with standing

Texas DOES have standing tho

Its a conflict between states, with Texas alleging a violation of the Constitution between states

I agree with you... just pointing out that was the only basis for their dismissal. But it's easy enough to get around that

That's exactly SCOTUS's job to arbitrate. And they pussied out.

I know. It should have been the most clear-cut case, too

even the 4 states haven't been able to deny they violated their constitutions

My problem is if they pussied out on that, odds of them finding in favor of us are slim to none.

Or even taking any case related to the election

if they are presented with the case in good standing, they will have to be extremely careful not to rule that the constitution is a document that can be violated

the Constitution is the sole basis for the authority of the government and the legal system (including SCOTUS). Rule that it can be blatantly violated and the door is open for whatever comes next

(which would likely be Texas seceding and taking most of the states with them to form a new union, in my opinion)

No Texas didn't have standing

They worded it poorly

You are conflating what you think is happening and not taking the actual suit into account

Fuck Scotus

I have yet to see anyone bring up the actual suit and show where there is standing

Just a bunch of retards screeching about it