Message from @Orwellianreptilian
Discord ID: 776190920000929873
Sounds like the exception, not the rule
Unless they have actual evidence and they provide it before they die
🤨
Are you trolling?
Oral testimony is the bulk of all evidence
One way or another
Also if they tell on themselves there is no plea
Most of the time
> A body, and a few people saying "He's the one!" has won many convictions in this country including on defendants who were actually innocent.
So... A witness (ex. whistleblower) AND hard evidence... This is what I've been saying
@Ragnarok
As it goes, anything you say can and will be used against you
I've heard of many cases where a confession wasn't enough by itself
Whistle blower is hard evidence
False
Objectively
If you say so
whistle blower is sworn to testify
It's a fact
But you experience comes from being fucked
at the risk of perjury
Mine comes from the part where the fucking happens
Typically people don't lie about the democrats doing shit when they are part of the people doing shit
They tend to get epsteined
the whistle blowers will be deposed by both sides
Besides we don't really need them for the criminal trial
if they are viewed as credible, their deposition will be filed with the court for the trial
Just the ones invalidating votes
Which is a much lower burden of proof
Hearsay isn't enough...
Which rn (at least that ik) is all that they have.
"I heard a guy say he was doing this" or "I heard a guy tell a guy to do that"
That isnt hearsay
It literally is
Its a first hand source
Hearsay is when you speak for someone else
Like if I say rags said something
Thats hearsay
hearsay is me saying I heard Ehzek say that he saw Orwell likes the peepee in the buttbutt
But if I say me and rags did something that isnt hearsay
> Like if I say rags said something
That's what I said...
@Ehzek
No it isnt
That would be me being a whistle blower
> But if I say me and rags did something that isnt hearsay
Name the guy who said "I did this" so I can check it out
@Ehzek