Whistle-blower is evidence

> Oral testimony will send people to the execution chamber.
You mean "has?"
Usually you need a body to prove murder
@Ragnarok

Sounds like the exception, not the rule

Unless they have actual evidence and they provide it before they die

🤨

Are you trolling?

Oral testimony is the bulk of all evidence

One way or another

Also if they tell on themselves there is no plea

Most of the time

> A body, and a few people saying "He's the one!" has won many convictions in this country including on defendants who were actually innocent.
So... A witness (ex. whistleblower) AND hard evidence... This is what I've been saying
@Ragnarok

As it goes, anything you say can and will be used against you

I've heard of many cases where a confession wasn't enough by itself

Whistle blower is hard evidence

False

Objectively

If you say so

whistle blower is sworn to testify

It's a fact

But you experience comes from being fucked

at the risk of perjury

Mine comes from the part where the fucking happens

Liberals lie, has to do with trait openness

Typically people don't lie about the democrats doing shit when they are part of the people doing shit

They tend to get epsteined

the whistle blowers will be deposed by both sides

Besides we don't really need them for the criminal trial

if they are viewed as credible, their deposition will be filed with the court for the trial

Just the ones invalidating votes

Which is a much lower burden of proof

Hearsay isn't enough...
Which rn (at least that ik) is all that they have.
"I heard a guy say he was doing this" or "I heard a guy tell a guy to do that"

That isnt hearsay

It literally is

Its a first hand source

Hearsay is when you speak for someone else

Like if I say rags said something

Thats hearsay

hearsay is me saying I heard Ehzek say that he saw Orwell likes the peepee in the buttbutt

But if I say me and rags did something that isnt hearsay

> Like if I say rags said something
That's what I said...
@Ehzek

No it isnt