not offenders

YES

that not the point???

could you site your study on intention

@eating my bread n having it too i literally just did

Stolzenberg &al., 2006

where

a source can cover 2 topics at the same time

holy shit

post what it says

@lillian the study doesn't even mention offenders

that section you quoted is mentioning victims

like

you seriously didn't notice this?

you read the paper yh

post a lil summary

it literally says “Poor Hispanics (25.3 per 1,000) had lower rates of violence compared to poor whites (46.4 per 1,000) and poor blacks (43.4 per 1,000)”

“Poor urban blacks (51.3 per 1,000) had rates of violence similar to poor urban whites (56.4 per 1,000).”

@eating my bread n having it too are you black

lower rate of violence = less victimization

here

lillian

do you see the infographiic right above that quote?

you see how the numbers are exactly the same on that infographic?

if you want me to be

do you see the title of that infographic?

"rate of violence" means victimization

neh

Not as fun

since ur citing a victimization source

just because they talked before abt victimization doesn’t mean they are throughout the entire source

im not getting an explanation about intention am i

PLS

THIS IS THE FUNNIEST THING I SEE TODAY

@eating my bread n having it too yah one sec one stupid person at a time

@lillian you cited a source on victimization lmao

the BJS split victims and offenders into separate documents

is this your first time studying crime by race?

“hey lol rates of violence are the same”

“they’re talking abt violence victimization “

Whats the argument