Message from @Desperado Dave
Discord ID: 742522222396047440
@Deleted User im not a shill
@Deleted User and they're are hundreds of actual truth channels Alex bill Hicks Jones is just a zioshill
Zen garden near me is really peaceful
R u rich
@Deleted User no this is downtown next to my apartments
!rank
!rank
Working on my first animation
got myself a joe biden ad
This guy cracks me up https://youtu.be/5Nc2FRRnG4g
https://banned.video/watch?id=5f35c13edf77c4044edda0fc
space is RACISS!!!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE9_56HroAA
Aposematism is the advertising by an animal to potential predators that it is not worth attacking or eating.[1] This unprofitability may consist of any defences which make the prey difficult to kill and eat, such as toxicity, venom, foul taste or smell, sharp spines, or aggressive nature. Aposematism always involves advertising signals, which may take the form of conspicuous coloration, sounds, odours[2] or other perceivable characteristics. Aposematic signals are beneficial for both predator and prey, since both avoid potential harm.
Agonistic Buffering
"The ‘use’ of infants by Barbary macaques in social interactions with other individuals is well documented. It normally involves a subordinate male intentionally approaching a more dominant male whilst holding an infant. Many studies have generated data that suggest that these triadic interactions (2 mature and an infant) reduce or modify the likelihood of aggression. This ‘Agonistic Buffering’ therefore assumes that infants are used to regulate social interactions and benefit the infant carrier which can reduce the risk of being set upon by other males.
The phenomenon has since been observed among other macaque and baboon species, however in recent weeks 2 images of grown men holding toddlers in potentially hostile or violent situations have caught my attention .
In the controversial Cataluña referendum on 1st October a man with his son in his arms seemingly avoided a more heavy-handed encounter with baton-brandishing police, who escort him away. In the other, an Everton FC fan gets caught up in the heat of the moment and aims a punch at a scuffle involving some of the players, perhaps in the knowledge of the fact that he was holding his son and would be somewhat safeguarded by this.
Although clearly not the same, arguably both these human examples bare at least some resemblance to the way that macaques use their infants in agonistic "buffering encounters. Is it possible that humans would use their infants as 'shields' in this way for their own social gain as do macaques?"
