lol

@Benny2Toes yes. One of 313 shooting in america pr day.

No,not Rosenbaum. The other one or 2 guys he shot

Or will you claim all 313 shootings pr 24 hrs are mass shootings?

good reason to stay out of the way

Rosenbaum was the first victim.

The ones who chased him down and tried to disarm him after

Well one of them straight up had a gun.

The other tried to take his gun.

if you become put of it then thats on you now

Should he just submit to mob justice then?

thats the ides

If they thought he was a mass shooter, were they wrong to act 8n the way they did? Did they sacrifice their right to live?

scary is it

@Benny2Toes They did not think that. He shot someone. nr. 313 that day.

Were they in reasonable fear of someone literally running away from them to the police?

laws clear

If they claim they thought that, I would like to know what they observed to lead them to think this was a mass shooter event? @Benny2Toes

as the defense, I would like to have that explained to me.

if you shoot someoneand its the wrong person your done

Ah @Doc. Yes. This is correct

So disprove my theory

Disprove intent.

I think I just did. Your witnesses cant answer the questions I have for them.

That's not how the justice system works though.

Do you see the problem here?

It is

You don't prove falsities.

so did rittenhouse have a right to be there yes

Sure.

You don't prove something /doesn't/ exist.

You cant prove it.

@Benny2Toes There is a problem, only due to the political climate.

But good lawyers make ypu try

Get my point?

No.

I agree that it was self defense

ya, but not possible here.

Mr. Grosskreutz will not be able to explain why he chased him down.

unless the defense is hopeless.

But it doesn't matter. He has to prove that the last 2 guys didn't think they were stopping a mass shooting.