@AntiFish03 Good points and I understand the pushback on the hero label. It's not exactly a self-evident title. I would suggest everyone there who honestly risked their safety to protect the livelihoods of friends and neighbours was a hero in some way. Purple heart, not exactly. But heroism comes in all shapes and sizes. Kyle isn't a hero because he was attacked. He's a hero because he was attacked in the line of duty, duty he volunteered for, knowing the possible consequences, and he handled the attack with bravery and restraint.

Where it gets REALLY murky is knowing Rosenbaugh (sp?) Well, I won't explain it. Someone else has. This is where it gets to be like......how much did he egg this on very much expecting the outcome of ☠️ (not kyle)

And kyle couldn't have known this aside from the verbal "shoot me then" infamous moment. Which you know you're not dealing with someone healthy when they command angrily that you shoot them.

https://youtu.be/4EM5vkF4yxw

Might he not have been attacked had he not been separated from the group? Sure, maybe. But I don't know the full context of how he came to be where he was at that time, so until I see something dumb, I won't call it dumb 🙂

...and as far as a good base foundation of video clips to go off of is here. Don't know if the source got buried. https://youtu.be/Z3IaFV_l2-k

...probably not the best choice of words 😂

I don't know if the link is far back in the thread.

He was originally at the location of the business owner who asked for help (where he put out the dumpster fire). Then he went with a group to another business needing help. He became separated when he was checking to see if anyone needed basic first aid, and the situation started from there.

I went full obsession researching when it happened 😅 That's how I originally found R&R Law. Elijah Schaeffer did some good coverage too (he interviewed Kyle earlier in the evening).

@AntiFish03 So, dumb, or poor judgement due to inexperience?

Poor judgment and lack of experience. I don't expect a 17 year old to have the experience necessary for a situation like that.

He shouldn't have left his group, but he didn't know that

I think "dumb" was substituted as a polite conversation filler to be "murder is bad" ... I don't think he was trying describe kyles decisions or actions, or whether or not people support them. Just my take.

👍

I have experience and training (although it is out of date now, I am not an active member of law enforcement anymore) but because of it I know I would not be immune to something similar, honestly it's not difficult to get sucked in as a good person to help others. The difference is that as an officer you have a lot more resources available to you. Like a radio and probably about a 100 other officers within 10-30 seconds. Vs a kid with no backup and out numbered probably 100 to 1. I am not going to slight him on his intentions at all. Helping people is an honorable thing and it should be praised. Being unaware of your surroundings and getting separated from your safety net though is a problem.

As a lifeguard he should have been taught something similar to this, if the area isn't safe don't go into it. It's step 1 for all first responder type positions. For an officer it's slightly different, it's secure the scene.

You can't do anything to help someone if you are the one who needs help.

Military also has the concept of no combat medicine for a reason as well.

No, I firmly believe what Kyle did was irresponsible and indeed dumb.

Take it as you will.

just a kid trying to help the community, probably not the best idea but not illegal

Never said it was illegal.

I fall under the category of "not the best idea".

yeah many are, its just being slow rolled because leftists might burn down Kenosha again when he is acquitted

What he did was illegal, though. I'm trying to dispel this notion that people seem to think because what I thought he did was dumb that he's a murderer.

Naw, he did something dumb without proper foresight, it's what kids do.

he did nothing illegal

curfew perhaps

i agree not very smart...

He did. It is indeed illegal to carry a gun under 18 years of age in Kenosha. You may like to argue the same line as his defense, but it's not going to work. You can't use some hunting clause in the statute to get around the basis of the law itself.

ive lived in Wisconsin for 40 years, taught firearms training and know the laws pretty damn well, a 16+ year old can possess a rifle or shotgun

as long as its not a short barreled shotgun

If they are hunting or training.

nope, its state law not hunting regulations

Weird, state law explicitly says it's illegal for people under 18 to carry around firearms.

Come again?

if u knew Wisconsin u would know they attemp frivilous charges all the time, they did for decades charging people for open carrying with disorderly conduct before we had CCW, we were one of the last states to pass it

Seems kind of contrary to you know, having the law explicitly state people under the age of 18 cannot posses firearms.

its totally legal for a 16yr old to carry or possess a rifle, the curfew thing maybe is an issue

And this defense has been shot down in more than one case.

It's not when it's not for the proper reasons.

It's only in certain exceptions that the minors carrying rifles is not a violation of the law.

yeah thats the issue, coupled with a curfew violation is akin to intent or lawful possession

And the statute cited by the defense is referencing (specifically) SBRs and hunting compliance.

he will be acquitted for sure of murder..