The election is a clear example but I won't go in depth in this channel.

It's a jury trial, keep that in mind.

Which means it's even more unexpected.

And unpredictable.

depends on the judge. @D EMC remember that judges some places are instructed to include "the sense of justice in populace" in their verdicts.

The Wisconsin governor ain't finna pardon him. You gotta remember they let this shit even happen.

Again, judge has no real say in this, it's a trial by jury.

If the governor said no, the riots would stop.

The jury are still humans

So pressure does matter

The jury are more prone to making irrational judgments out of line with precedence.

I'm not advocating to go threaten em, what I'm saying is that people are pressuring em.

depends on the humans. Study indicate a bimodal curve. Some humans buckle down on their ideals under pressure. The other cohort goes with the crowd factor

And if I recall, you cannot appeal a trial by jury, I could be wrong though. Not at least the verdict itself.

the jury only determines guilty or not guilty, right?

in your system?

It's a bit more complicated than that.

But generally it's faux pas to bring up acquittal.

That sucks tbh

i see

Based on what you know rn, what're the odds he walks?

impossible to calculate

So both are likely?

One is more likely than the other.

It's by no means a sure thing though.

Which is which

@D EMC, you just advanced to level 8!

Not guilty.

Pray for rittenhouse

😂

Y'all seem chill n reasonable. Lemme add you

based on forensic evidence alone, Chauvin should walk on a murder charge, but not on reckless endagerment. I am not - NOT - expecting that outcome.

Unlikely

Imagine the riots

exactly

Kenosha will look like a joke by comparison

but the forensic report is high quality and very clear.

But I wouldn't expect much more than 10 years

What's that female cops name?

She broke into the home of some black guy n shot him

ah, right. 😄