@Alondraz @TaLoN132 I'm a big fan of Russell but his affidavit was flawed, he used Minnesota precincts instead of Michigan precincts FOR SOME. He listed way more precincts than what the article corrected, though. You should consider that.

That affidavit it not yet valid.

It is not yet sworn.

And I have evaluated the Georgia data, you can evaluate it as well.

It's exactly how he says in the affidavit. The decimal points only go out to thousandths place

@Repeat Those are like Onion articles now. Thanks for sharing.

It's odd that they wouldn't include the actual vote count.

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/georgia/president.json

Here is python code you can analyze for this:

The results start here in the json: `["data"]["races"][0]["timeseries"]`

None of the numbers matters though if Lin Wood wins that suit.

If I designed an API to update the media dashboards, I wouldn't send Trump's vote count as a vote_Share of .567, I would send the actual amount: 5234523

It's circumstantial evidence, but it's still odd that they would design it like this

@NoobDad Trying to prove anything from the updates to media organizations during election night is trying to ascertain participant's demeanors during a trial from courtroom sketches.

@TaLoN132 Not if it's pass-through data like Russell states.

It's in line with the Black Box video

@Repeat Which Lin Wood case? The one that was dismissed for lack of standing on Friday? Or is there another one?

If the total count is 1235235, then .567 of that vote would be: 700,378.245

That's obviously impossible

No, it’s still standing. Watch Judge Jeanine Pirro video with Lin Wood on Twitter. He says it’s still standing

Short video too. Like 7 minutes long.

we lose data from the decimal, there is a variance. If we rounded from .5665 to .567 and if we rounded down from .567499999999999

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.54.0_3.pdf

The variance is from 699761 - 700995

There's plenty of wiggle room there

Yes, @TaLoN132 the judge only struck one part and left the rest standing according to Lin Wood

But the problem is, if Trump is dominating like he was, you lose your wiggle room

I wrote a script that checked if the votes were swapped in Georgia, but I tuned it by comparing the lowest value of Trump with Biden's highest value for each entry

The link above from CourtListener is the Judge's ruling. It pretty clearly says denied.

And I found no discrepencies except one. It happened at 1:12AM EST. Both of their votes went down. like a "reset" or something

Just telling you what Lin Wood said, that the judge said

Did you all already see this https://rumble.com/vbbszz-georgia-bombshell-analysis-biden-takes-min-98-of-a-23487-vote-batch-at-1218.html

Watch the video lol @TaLoN132

@NoobDad GA is moot... They will have completed 2 recounts. One by hand and one by machine. There is no vote switching happening.

I was just interested in looking at it since I"ve spent lot of time reading about it.

I saw this video and that's why I wanted to research it myself.

@Repeat I read most of the ruling. The Judge explains pretty clearly why he dismissed it.

Yeah, just telling you what Lin Wood claimed that he had “just found out” himself

@TaLoN132 the video spells it out

@NoobDad @Alondraz I'm trying to find information on how the NYT Edison Research NEP data is collected, but I was able to find something that details how the AP does it. Given that they are competitors, they likely have similar processes. I think you will find it interesting. It is a combination of phone calls, with manual entry, users refreshing and copying totals from state websites, and some automated feeds. It is a hodgepodge of heterogenous systems and processes. Trying to find your smoking gun in that is not going to yield any meaningful data. It's like astrology - looking for meaning based on trying to find what you want to find.

Here's the link: https://www.ap.org/en-us/topics/politics/elections/counting-the-vote