Message from @busillis

Discord ID: 781974822430441477


2020-11-27 20:02:07 UTC  

Rocket Man is a Chinese proxy instigator

2020-11-27 20:02:11 UTC  

Yes, Zulu, which is why you're going to slowly start seeing more growing populism.

2020-11-27 20:02:16 UTC  

And nationalism.

2020-11-27 20:02:18 UTC  

Didnโ€™t Kim jong-un call trump old? An he got offended ๐Ÿ˜‚ rocket man is a slightly more polite than thug. Kind of ๐Ÿ™ˆ

2020-11-27 20:02:46 UTC  

No one is giving up the China production cash cow. Ever.

2020-11-27 20:02:49 UTC  

Yes he is.

2020-11-27 20:03:21 UTC  

Iunno, we'll have to see.

2020-11-27 20:03:36 UTC  

The American populace is growing ever more hostile towards China.

2020-11-27 20:03:40 UTC  

He called Trump fat I think...it was hilarious and then the bromance started...

2020-11-27 20:03:45 UTC  

The human factory of the world ๐Ÿ˜

2020-11-27 20:03:59 UTC  

That's the problem. We won't see unless there are covenants with their tax incentives.

2020-11-27 20:04:10 UTC  

And give up their investment in China too...it will never happen.

2020-11-27 20:04:30 UTC  

Nope

2020-11-27 20:04:31 UTC  

Never.

2020-11-27 20:05:12 UTC  

> And give up their investment in China too...it will never happen.
@busillis That's what I meant by covenants...to relocate structure.

2020-11-27 20:05:35 UTC  

Are the farmers in the midwest hurting cuse of the tariff imposed to China..

2020-11-27 20:06:19 UTC  

But blank checks written directly to their bottom lines with a wink are not the way.

2020-11-27 20:06:22 UTC  

Sorry I missed the last bit until it was reposted

2020-11-27 20:07:45 UTC  

Yes. China can afford the trade wars, the US cannot. And letโ€™s not forget the US taken on many trade wars. Canada, Mexico, EU

2020-11-27 20:08:29 UTC  

Actually they weren't tax incentives. They were flat out gifts with no strings attached. Like when Carrier took the $7mm and opened up their Mexico plant anyway. Laid off like 1400 people in Indiana. That was a Trump 2016 campaign stunt.

2020-11-27 20:08:46 UTC  

What do you mean? No more cheap TVs from Walmart, subsidized by the CCP and our banking overlords?

2020-11-27 20:11:26 UTC  

If it weren't for their economic and environmental policies, I'd turn Republican t-t-t-today, junior.

2020-11-27 20:11:52 UTC  

The fallacy in producing less tangible goods than one's country consumes is lost on most.

2020-11-27 20:12:31 UTC  

Although I bet the Bank of China will loan me some money for a hamburger.

2020-11-27 20:12:34 UTC  

No more trading war. With Biden... maybe i will be able to buy a big screen TV. Finally

2020-11-27 20:12:37 UTC  

Quite happily

2020-11-27 20:13:22 UTC  

@MatiLuc big screen TVs are quite inexpensive compared to 10 years ago.

2020-11-27 20:13:51 UTC  

@MatiLuc what is your definition of fix screen anything larger than a Mobile screen?

2020-11-27 20:14:01 UTC  

That's innovation cost being absorbed.

2020-11-27 20:14:39 UTC  

Possibly

2020-11-27 20:15:00 UTC  

My tv looks like a large monitor

2020-11-27 20:15:23 UTC  

What is a TV actually?

2020-11-27 20:15:59 UTC  

I don't believe I've watched what used to be considered a TV for 20 years

2020-11-27 20:15:59 UTC  

@busillis, you just advanced to level 8!

2020-11-27 20:16:43 UTC  

But yeah

2020-11-27 20:16:49 UTC  

Find a way to mass produce and it's off to the races. They sell off old technology to sell to people. The lines are already there. New new tech is expensive and that's to what people are addicted.

2020-11-27 20:17:31 UTC  

And those lines are in China, to a staggering degree.

2020-11-27 20:17:41 UTC  

Agreed

2020-11-27 20:18:19 UTC  

When it reached the point of having AI devices omnipresent I feel like I have to opt out

2020-11-27 20:18:27 UTC  

Lmao

2020-11-27 20:18:33 UTC  

50" is for me a big screen tv.