Therefore we can't even determine if the system is prone to error because the evidence of the system being prone to error is in error.

What would need the standard of merit in your opinion?

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Being established in a court of law. That's what we have.

yes. the statements of this judge are being used to discredit the people who are challenging a system claimed to be full of errors, because the system the people used to bring the case was inherently prone to error

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire whatever that is. I don't know and, frankly, I don't think you do either. We have people for that.

Yes, this happens ALL THE TIME in law.

Arizona just certified? Good for them

And rightfully so.

Now just lose the senate

"EPIC SMACKDOWN OF RETARDED HILLYBILLY INBREED TRUMP SUPPORTERS WHO LITERALLY HAVE THEIR HEADS UP THEIR ASSES"

And it happens for people defending themselves from the state.

James, you just showed your bias lol.

@yetiCodes, you just advanced to level 5!

@yetiCodes I’m very anti conservatives

We completely dismiss evidence which is improperly done and cannot be vetted.

That has been gathered illegally, etc.

The conservative people of 2020 more so than the conservative ideology itself @yetiCodes

Conservatives of 2012 were ok

That we cannot validate with any level of certainty.

@Maw True. Robert spelled that out last week.

yes of course

Oh snap. James outed himself on political bias. Had the opposite idea the whole time. Damn bro.

The the lawyers set the bar of standards about as low as you can.

#exposed

Lmao

To the point where we couldn't even verify if an Affidavit was written by Putin himself under an alias.

@james j I don’t think there is a case to be made for that.

tell me now how I am stupid and wrong for applying the same logic to a voting system that also has inherent flaws

Made for what? @yetiCodes

I'm not going to call you stupid, it's not something I do.

I agree, the system has been broken for a long time.

I'm all for various reforms.

But you're talking about the legal system.

Being anti-conservative 2020 vs being anti-conservatives ideology.

I would just be curious how many conservatives you actually know and converse with.

Reforms go to the legislative branch, not the judicial branch.

i know you don't, its people like james, zulu, and the other far leftists here that disparage everyone who questions the voting system. they are applying the exact same scrutiny to the process of evidence collecting as people like me are applying to the voting systems

and claiming that i am wrong and have been totally owned and made to look like an idiot

"your evidence collecting was inherently prone to errors, therefore its invalid."
"your voting system was inherently prone to errors, therefore its invalid."