Everyone one of these experts only have limited data available to them (data that is in the public domain). They don’t don’t have the raw verifiable data.

But you have to consider how they recreated the same distribution effect.

@Adam135, you just advanced to level 13!

Honestly, if you have doubts, bring his findings to a data expert who's politically leaning the other way

see what they say,

Math would show that a Bumble Bee can not Fly?

Absolutely, I am genuinely looking at the data and if it’s substantial it should be taken to court. The pattern has been more the information war and when none in the evidence arena, hence all cases are being thrown out.

We can talk in circles about it, but we're really just laymans compared to that guy, experts should be brought into to debunk his findings if they are flawed, and that has yet to happen.

Big Tech Twitter dropped the math wizards account. Getting close.

Robert said it himself last night, if you have doubts about how they compiled data and analyzed it, all you can do is bring additional experts to either confirm or refute it and let them have their day in court.

I am sure someone thought of that.

Plus, I mean considering how many chains of custody were broken during this whole election, that's already enough to signal red flags that need to be looked further into.

Refute what? The election process. As far as I can tell experts have been bought in, experts have verified the claims. The DOJ, FBI, NSA, Secret Service, Cyber security firms, independents.

verified that there was a security breach?

Some of these chain of custody claims is an issue and should be investigated. But is it mass voter fraud?

Verified that no breach happened.

and people at DEFCON and other intelligence sources say otherwise. Including the FEC

Question: if the systems were breached then why do the hand counts tally up?

Why does Dominion store votes as floating point decimals and not whole integers?

The court of public opinion rules via body politic here. Try educating the public on “chain of custody”. It’s easier for media to just hoodwink the public. Both fall into the ditch.

You only Refute Evidence in Court. Has this been excepted as Evidence Yet?

has anyone contested their claims aside from just declaring it baseless outright?

I cannot answer that and neither can the experts. Dominion can, Raffensberg can. Other officials can.

@William Dinan No. And team Trump doesn't want it to be. It's 100% appealing to the public.

It's not a good image for Dominion either way,

I agree. Why dominion is being used I don’t know...should have used home gown tech.

No tech should have been involved whatsoever

Even here in Canada, we don't use counting machines to tabulate votes

Wouldn't have mattered who it was. I think you know that.

@Zuluzeit that is their intent IMO.

Canadians rejected D. They know it’s unreliable.

We need to send you all a manual in basic elections processes.

Again, if the system was breached why do the hand counts add up?

My ballot disappeared into a computer

they remain unbalanced from county to county

Elaborate?

Aggravated votes

Lol where would you like it to go?

In the Cornel's testimony near the beginning of the hearing. From Matt Braynards own data compilations

Btw they have a senate hearing in michigan later today

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0-vyw9qbdw