Thanks for posting the great formidable team . Nice to see

They called tucker a racist

Dont most people think that

His head writer was fired for being one

tucker is a sit on the fence type, he tries to be non biased

Lol

They already got caught lying haha

He is as right wing as you can get

Lying about what @Dedkraken

Project veritas blamed comments on the black man 😅

On fox news standards

@TW20, you just advanced to level 1!

I see tucker and hannity as the same in terms of bias . Only tucker reaches the younger audience.

I guess by Fox standards Chris Wallace is like a communist

They said Trump lost the election the scandal

Thanks Watching the Watchers 🙂

Lol reporting the results of the election is the scandal

That's probably true James

Agree James. The reporting. . . if only it was true journalism

Official vote counts fake news

There needs to be ethics and moral standards code for media. Like for other professions. At least they can all try being ethical, even if they miss it sometimes. Theres respinning news just to meet a story timeline. They dont bother with research or factual reporting

What kind of ethics and morals do you want

Like other professionals have, e.g. accountants, lawyers, etc - they have to sign off on them before they can be certified with their designation

How will you enforce the rules? Factchecking?

so I just watched Ayyadurai's testimony in the AZ hearing and I don't know what he is thinking? https://youtu.be/bB2dTjJGdpE

They all should at least sign off on respecting the constitution and not interfere with elections or govt officials

@TW20, you just advanced to level 2!

Thank you Watching the Watchers 🙂

one he gives another possibility other than the vote swapping and why I casually disregards it is beyond me

Interfering with elections and govt officials? You mean asking the government questions for transparency?

I think the good dr disproved himself in testimony

Asking the government for transparency is one thing, interference is another

Interference in what way?

two, far as I can tell his model assumes a uniform distribution from precinct to precinct, that is regardless of size he assumes that the percentages go according to his model but that doesn't necessarily have to be the case in fact one would expect much greater variance in the smaller precincts

I'm singularly unimpressed with his presentation as evidence of election fraud

What do you see with how media suppresses one govt ideology over another, covering up scandals

I clipped his kraken views from the last video

or we count the actual physical ballots like in GA and make sure the totals match what the computers told us ... which they did for GA

I dont think a news outlet worth much is going to cover a scandal they cant factually verify

Yeah meglide that's basically what he said if dominion tallies match hand recount what I am saying is wrong which is weird caus we did that haha

For example, the .pdf images were deleted by the tabulators as instructed by their supervisors, according to Dr Shiva