But the ballots you saw were processed in front of observers

@samwisegamgee77 Look at @james j 's history talking about counting in GA. He's believed the "current narrative" by the officials every step of the way to finally conceding that they continued counting not even when video evidence was shown scoffing that the papers in the boxes weren't even ballots, but only after the officials admitted to them being ballots, even with direct contradictory evidence in his face. He's a bad faith arguer.

I was told 100 of thousands of ballots and the video showed 4 bags @DrSammyD

@James j you are IDIOT!!!!!!!@@@

Also trucks of ballots coming in

That is exactly what 8m saying drsammy

@DarinS40 you think there is fraud with no proof

@samwisegamgee77 you are saying that there was fraud in that video. There isn’t yet you will continue to believe there is

The video even shows the lady running the same stack of ballots through multiple times

There is mountains of evidence

The same lady who put the table there and opened in the morning, was there pulling the boxes out from under the table after everyone was sent home

@samwisegamgee77, you just advanced to level 4!

Omg, if a ballot gets jammed they run it through again , that isn’t fraud that’s just some drunk witness looking for attention @samwisegamgee77

@James j you are an IDIOT!!!!!! You hear me you are an IDIOT IDIOT IDIOT IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!

@DarinS40 I hear your tiny voice yelling fraud that doesn’t exist

There is wide spread fraud

Nope

Gabriel sterling completely bullshitted his way through the news all day today and yesterday

A affidavit is nothing unless you can prove it

@james j you a fucking IDIOT

Show me something that disproves it... anything

@samwisegamgee77 I’m sure you see any narrative that says fraud didn’t happen is a lie because you are convinced it happens despite there being no evidence

Disprove a fantasy? @samwisegamgee77

There is plenty of evidence

There is so much compounding evidence it is busting at the seams my friend

Nothing short of election officials admitting they scanned illegal ballots intentionally will get you to admit there's evidence. Even then You'd probably say it was coerced.

It’s not compounding . It’s a bunch of unverifiable claims @samwisegamgee77

@james j you are an IDIOT IDIOT IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!

@DarinS40, you just advanced to level 1!

@DrSammyD no I am open to evidence that isn’t easily refutable

Not just one allegation. Its one event that was confirmed by tens of other events that show a very high likelihood of fraud

@DarinS40 cool man

Name one confirmed event of fraud that could effect the outcome of the election? @samwisegamgee77

You have to be honest with yourself james... how can you say that the video and surrounding evidence is easily refutable?

Read the link @samwisegamgee77 it explained what happened

Everything was done per the law

reputable? Wasn't though... not in many cases

None of witnesses said anything verifiable @samwisegamgee77

The link was written by a party to downplay what was shown and what has been corroborated

Give me your best example @samwisegamgee77

@james j I'm done arguing with an IDIOT and you can go to HELL