@Corndog which things? I was saying the starting point for this election or any election is not “prove this isn’t fraudulent” . The starting point is always it’s a valid election until proven other wise. That’s why there are challenges. There is no post election checking required. Trump took this opportunity to appeal but thus far has not provided anything significant.
To which you said “You assume there is a burden to prove the election non fraudulent.” and “I said no I didn’t why do you say that?” and here we are. So what do you want to do now? I don’t need evidence from you unless you want to show me something else. You have no more of a burden than the contrary point that it was a fraudulent election . My point in the middle is that we don’t know currently enough to make that call either way.
It's over. He is trying to keep an open mind as best he can while he watches evidence that is shown. You, @james j choose to believe that evidence he finds valid isn't.
At the end of the day the evidence never actually went through any rigorous fact finding procedure to validate it. Just press conferences (Because they didn’t even reach the level needed to be admissible in court)
