Message from @Soburin
Discord ID: 785187997406330891
Lol
I do have standards.
We should play something analogous to fantasy football for q purveyors the dream team of q know-it-alls
We all bet urinal cakes whoever wins takes all the urinal cakesl
@Soburin i saw alot of the hearings to .. i heard alot of .. i dont know what were they doing. . We didn't do things like this .. they didn't need me..
It's some kind of troll...
The media is paying Trump to keep it alive so they can keep getting click clicks.
Biden doesn't seem very exciting to report on, he's going to have to up his game on antics in order to compete with the orange Jesus'POTUS news legacy.
@Soburin yes i agree to they should do the court hearing and suit people that are trying to mislead the voters .
@busillis People (including myself) are looking forward to politics slowly turning the volume down to 3-4 rather than 11.
I'm just so tired of hearing about Trump.
The hearings are, I think, for two purposes. First, to get the legislatures to use their power to nullify results, overturn the results or choose electors based on what the results really were prior to the cheating... and second, for public awareness so people can actually hear the witnesses where as the courts keep making that impossible.
There's no repercussions for Trump... If all the people giving evidence perjured themselves
So you think a court hearing would reinforce a lie?
No, give Trump the chance to prove he was robbed.
If he wasn't, then the court should be able to figure that out
How do you prove it if the ballots are secret.
At this point it's not provable in an unequivocal way
Perhaps that's the point
how can we know if we don't hear all the evidence?
That's exactly my point no primary source data.
Going to work txt later
Will ever be available to prove it or disprove it one round in the circular logic.
you're making a conclusion on incomplete information
I'm making conclusion based off of election law and looking at the system.
Is election fraud possible
Yes
If you were basing it off election law then you would have to give the election to Trump because all the states involved violated their own election law
But at scale, not so much
While that may or may not be true it's a state issue and we all will have to wait on the respective States ruling.
it's no longer a states issue when it affects the national election
That's not up to the federal court system.
it is
at least the disputes are
Yes it is if it Violates the US Constitution ....
Having latitude to change the election regul ation by some state legislatures to the secretaries of State or election boards.
Seemingly at violates the US Constitution but we're not making that determination.